Bake1987

April 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nadar (caste), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nadar (caste) was changed by Bake1987 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-09T13:04:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism by Mr.Doku for comparing the Tamil Nadars with Kerala Nadars

Go through all the links you have posted Mr. Doku. You make it sound like that the whole Nadar race had to follow this caste restriction. Post a proof which says that the Tamil Nadars had to face the same kind of caste restriction. I will post the appropriate proofs. Till then this article should never appended with the Nadar main article.Bake1987 (talk) 14:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

I have moved our conversation to the article talk page Talk:Upper cloth revolt. Thanks. Docku:“what up?” 17:22, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/PONDHEEPANKAR (2nd nomination) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Avruch ^T 13:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

You cant scare me with this, Mr.Avruch. You are not dealing with a single person here. You are dealing with a caste. Post bluffs like this else where!!! Investigate and do whatever you want too.You are disturbing this article for a long time just to prove that you are right!!. I would kindly ask the administrators to look into this issue. Avruch is intensionally trying to alter this article and is not even bothered to look into the other tamil caste articles. This page should remain like this or must be deleted. Or someone should also alter the other tamil caste articles. Editing this article alone is like disgracing this caste in front of the other castes. The proofs posted along with this article are very appropriate. Kindly consider them b4 editingBake1987 (talk) 07:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I've edited a number of other caste articles, but most of them don't have a sockwarrior defending inappropriate content. Avruch ^T 12:55, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Editing a few articles wont make you a God here, o great Avruch. LOL!!Bake1987 (talk) 15:26, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

You are not dealing with a single person here. You are dealing with a caste. Are you trying to scare us? WP is not political mouthpiece for any Indian caste, and articles will detail positive, negative aspects of any subject to maintain neutral point of view. If you can not understand and digest this simple concept, you should really ponder about the time wasted here. Sorry to have been blunt. Docku:“what up?” 15:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

If this is not neutral,then why dont you consider other articles?? Coz this is not gonna stop even if i am out of here... This article must be deleted then. Is disturbing a race unnecessarily the way of wikipedia. The reasonless edits often happen here. People with no knowledge do the job of editing. If the article should be more neutral, then people should consider editin it accordingly. Deleting the entire article and leaving it with absolutely nothing is not actually editing. I am a NADAR. I am no socketwarrior.Figure it out yourself. And dont talk about neutrality ,docu. You wrote an article which disgraced our entire caste!! Bake1987 (talk) 16:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Upper cloth revolt is neither a novel nor fiction. If you happen to perceive facts written as an article is an effort to disgrace a community, I cant help it. Docku:“what up?” 15:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Ya right. U made it sound as if the whole Nadar community had to bare their breasts in front of the Nairs and nambudharis. And never mentioned precisely dat the incident happenened in a malayalee dominated region. The way u presented that article was definitely not a neutral point of view. Coz i am hurt!! My ancestors lived the life of an aristocrat in their place and you write an article which says that they had to bare their breasts in front of everyone! This only happened to a few nadars near travancore. But u never mentioned dat specifically..16:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC)Bake1987 (talk)

How does it matter? If it is whole community or a small fraction of them who had to perform those despicable acts? There is a lot of information in wikipedia which hurts me too. I dont go around trying to remove them. Docku:“what up?” 17:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Whoever said abt removing it!! Wat u dont understand wat i am trying to explain or are u jus fooling around. U r the one who started the talk abt neutrality. The neutrality of that article was not at all balanced. Period!!Bake1987 (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Nadar books

Books for reference for Nadar

http://books.google.com/books?id=HzlkWtM9IJYC&pg=PA68&dq=Caldwell+nadar#PPA68,M1

http://books.google.com/books?id=xUUqMu0k37MC&pg=PA233&dq=chanar+Ceylon&lr=#PPA233,M1

Some readings http://www.geocities.com/MUDIRAJA/mudiraju_warriortribes.html

thanks Daya Anjali (talk / contribs) 11:25, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Harris01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Harris01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:W.P.A. Soundrapandiyanar.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:W.P.A. Soundrapandiyanar.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

you recent reverts without explanation!

None of these references, http://www.gemify.com/private/hrpt/basechera.html, http://nadar.kuttyjapan.com/nadar-history.asp, http://www.gemify.com/private/hrpt/basechera.html, http://www.vgprealestate.com/founder.htm, http://www.mgmdizzeeworld.com/board.htm, http://www.sishri.org/Deccan.html, you used for Nadar (caste) article is nowhere near to being called reliable. Please read WP:Reliable Sources for some help. If you keep reverting changes without providing reliable sources, you will be taken to the appropriate notice board. Good luck. --Docku: What's up? 16:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Good luck to you. Is bothering the nadars alone the only thing you do?

I hope you got a chance to review WP:Reliable sources and my points above. --Docku: What's up? 16:59, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

If you r so just and right why are you just concerned about this article and not the articles of other tamil castes. It means you are upto something surely. Bake1987 (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Please read WP:No personal attacks. you dont seem interested in discussing about building an encyclopedia, rather just my history and intention. I encourage you remove all unreliably sourced info from the article and back it up with reliable sources. --Docku: What's up? 18:09, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't have to discuss things with anyone who's deliberately trying to alter things for his sake. Talk about encyclopedia etc else where.

File copyright problem with File:Sivanthi_adithan.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sivanthi_adithan.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 01:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:W.P.A. Soundrapandiyanar.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:W.P.A. Soundrapandiyanar.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2013 (UTC)