Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Xiang09 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Xiang09. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have no ideo who the hell this Xiang09 is, I believe Glennznl linked me to it as a way to have my account blocked and to removed some informations that I added, particularly in Bathala page, because he/she don't like it (I don't know what his/her agenda is). I admit that I previously edited wikipedia without an account, but this (balantoc) is my first and only account in wikipedia. I'm still new here, I don't know how wikipedia work and I have no idea that I am causing some disruption etc. by editing it/adding info. I used Potet books because he is a reliable source, despite being self published, he based his information on chronicles and historical records and documentations written by the Spanish colonizers themselves. And no, I will not appeal to be unblocked because I know wikipedians like Glennznl will just keep requesting to have me blocked or even banned. I'm done with wikipedia. Balantoc (talk) 07:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply