March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Josve05a. I noticed that you removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Dr Haneef Shareef, and I wanted to let you know that I have replaced it. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source or were created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 15:47, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles, unless reliable sources have been provided, as you did with Dr Haneef Shareef. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. (tJosve05a (c) 17:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue removing Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did with Dr Haneef Shareef, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (tJosve05a (c) 18:53, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Also, please stop trying to bribe users to deltet the tag for you! (tJosve05a (c) 18:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

March 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dr Haneef Shareef may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[Category:Balochistan directors

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Balochi tamur. You have new messages at Josve05a's talk page.
Message added 19:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

(tJosve05a (c) 19:15, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.(tJosve05a (c) 08:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dr Haneef Shareef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dr Haneef Shareef for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dr Haneef Shareef is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr Haneef Shareef until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yunshui  12:17, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

/* Dr Haneef Shareef */

edit

why you nominated for deletion these are name of his book which are in Balochi.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Haneef Shareef, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

donot make any change in this article

edit

Donot change Dr Haneef Shareef article.It is correct.

Donot make any changes in Dr Haneef Shareef Article.

edit

This is request to you please donot make any changes in Haneef Shareef article.Thanks

It looks like you do not understand Wikipedia. Nobody owns articles in Wikipedia. From that page: Work submitted to Wikipedia can be edited, used, and redistributed—by anyone. Please remember to sign your posts in talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). -- Alexf(talk) 14:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Saeed Shad

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Saeed Shad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alexf(talk) 14:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dr Haneef Shareef

edit

I know,but donot change this article all filmography or career. because i made this article and i provided correct information.

I've nothing against including information about his film career if it can be sourced to reliable references, but you cannot use the text from his website; it is not freely licenced and doing so is therefore a violation of the website owner's copyright. Yunshui  14:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of DranDeh

edit
 

The article DranDeh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable, unsourced.

Does not indicate how it meets WP:MOVIE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mani Petha Brath Nest

edit
 

The article Mani Petha Brath Nest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unremarkable, unsourced.

Does not indicate how it meets WP:MOVIE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 14:09, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to Haneef Shareef has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Yunshui  14:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

which is copy right..

edit

Which one i copied tell me?

You need to listen to the advice you are being given. A number of experienced editors - myself included - have explained that what you are doing is not in line with Wikipedia policy. The text you keep adding is taken almost verbatim from http://haneefshareef.weebly.com/ which is not released under an appropriate free licence. Indeed, by repeatedly adding this material you are actually breaking the law. If you continue in this vein, your account will be blocked from editing, and you will no longer be able to contribute to Wikipedia. Please for everyone's sake, read the copyright policy and the verifiability policy (you may also want to look at the deletion policy as well) before continuing to edit. Yunshui  14:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of DranDeh for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DranDeh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DranDeh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf(talk) 14:41, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mani Petha Brath Nest for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mani Petha Brath Nest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mani Petha Brath Nest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf(talk) 14:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

oh sorry.

edit

But i created that website,if you say to delete this website then i will delete this website totally ok.

WikiProject Pakistan

edit
Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia. I'm from WikiProject Pakistan. We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Pakistan.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or at the Wikiproject Pakistan noticeboard and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We are looking forward to see you around!
Mar4d (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
You may also be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Balochistan. Mar4d (talk) 15:06, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I deleted that website

edit

I delete that website totally,now my article is not copy right.

I guess that's one solution... Of course, you realise that you've also removed the only sourced material and all the sources, which were the only thing preventing the article from being deleted. I'm done here; if you won't listen when people attempt to help, then I see no further reason to waste my time. Yunshui  15:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Saeed Shad

edit

why this article is nominated for criteria for speedy deletion..I deleted all copy right with that website.

There is no mention of copyrighted info in Saeed Shad deletion request. The speedy deletion notice clearly states it is because notability was not asserted. Please read it again and respond appropriately in the article's Talk page if you want to defend it. You need to read the notices and links that have been repeatedly give to you in an effort to help you understand. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. As such we can only accept notable subjects. You wrote several articles, and almost all of them have the same issue. Please do not post or edit anymore until you read, and understand, what people are trying to tell you. Also, as said before - several times now - please sign your posts in talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). -- Alexf(talk) 15:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I created Saeed Shad article before two weeks

edit

I created Saeed Shad article before two weeks that time this article was accept by you people,now what you people nominate criteria for speedy deletion,i request to you delete it.Thanks

Removal of maintenance tags at Haneef Shareef

edit

  Please stop removing maintenance tags without fixing the underlying issue. You have done this repeatedly. This is not appropriate behavior and it is considered vandalism. Doing this again will lead to a block of your account. Please also read about the Three-revert rule which you are already in breach of. Please stop, read and ask. Do not blindly revert. -- Alexf(talk) 15:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

ok

Balochi tamur (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)please delete the Proposed deletion of DranDeh DranDeh ia a movie and movie is also listed in IMDB.And all his sources are pure and correct thanks.Balochi tamur (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for sock puppetry (User:Balochifilm). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Using various IP addresses to evade your block is unacceptable. You have done it three times so far on three addresses to post to Haneef Shareef and Saeed Shad. You had ample warnings and opportunities to discuss. The block was placed and the reasons explained to you right above. I am extending your block. If you want to discuss and appeal, please do so here.You are not to edit anywhere else until this issue is resolved or your block expires. You are welcome to make your case here. -- Alexf(talk) 11:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Since you have continued evading your block with the account User:T h baloch, I have extended your block to three months. You, the person, are prohibited from editing Wikipedia during that period, under any account or whilst logged out as an IP. Any edits you make will be reverted, and any accounts or IPs that you use will be blocked. Yunshui  12:18, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Haneef Shareef, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balochi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

edit

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 01:17, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!