Bamadawg
Recent edits
edit
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Elizabeth Warren. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MastCell Talk 21:04, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
November 2019
edit
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:John Solomon (political commentator) for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 14:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:The Epoch Times, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
- To clarify, if I see it I'll block you indefinitely as WP:NOTHERE. Doug Weller talk 10:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just a quick note here that I just another user and am not an admin. I do want to let you know in case you were not aware that Talk:Spanish Flu is subject to discretionary sanctions at the moment per the {{COVID19 GS editnotice}} template and authorized here. I am bringing this up per your edit here which may not be compliant with Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines and Wikipedia:Etiquette. Again, please note that this is a friendly notice of caution. --Super Goku V (talk) 05:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Understood
Thank you F. L. (talk) 14:45, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a discussion forum
editHi Bamadawg. Did you forget that Doug Weller warned you not to use article talk pages for inappropriate discussion, just a few months ago? Injecting this type of comment into an already heated content dispute is not helpful, and not consistent with Wikipedia's purpose. - MrX 🖋 17:09, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
I was trying to be honest, not helpful. If the standard is “all mainstream media” then it will not be met. That is a valid point and only an emotional partisan would see it any other way.
F. L. (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- This dropped off my watchlist. I'm trying to decide between an indefinite block and a topic ban from American Politics. You could still edit everywhere else, including those areas where you may have professional knowledge. Doug Weller talk 18:14, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- The proportion of good edits to disruptive edits is very low. I think an indef block is warranted, until such time as Bamadawg convinces us that they will refocus their efforts to improving the encyclopedia. - MrX 🖋 18:24, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
I’ll try to carry on, somehow F. L. (talk) 18:37, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia has been garbage for some time now. So, have fun guys. I’ll continue keeping Wikipedia out of our academic endeavors and professional life. F. L. (talk) 18:41, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
August 2020
edit Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:Joe Biden, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:10, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Video doesn’t lie. I won’t add any more truth to Wikipedia’s sham article on Biden.
F. L. (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
Just got email Checked your user page
You seem like an ok guy The truth won’t come out about Joe—it’s already out. But, I’ll respect your ruling F. L. (talk) 20:23, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, please look at this with your admin glasses--I'm about to go look at the user's other edits to see if 72 hours was too kind. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 20:23, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Drmies, this user does appear to have been simmering under the surface mostly, with that edit I RevDel'd last month being one of the few that rose above the surface. There's a case to go for indef. Their response to your block message is not encouraging. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:31, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Oh noes !!!!!
F. L. (talk) 20:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Whatever. See ya soon, probably after the election. Will be interesting to see the propagandists here shill for whatever the narrative will be. F. L. (talk) 21:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)Nothing can stop what is coming. 😂 F. L. (talk) 20:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)When Wikipedia decides it wants to be an encyclopedia and not a propaganda arm of leftists, I might come back. Or I’ll come back anyway after the election.
F. L. (talk) 21:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)