Bamao

Hi! Leave me here a message (in English). It would not bad to improve my English here on wp by discussion. It's nice, isn't it? But probably as a university student in the following month I have a little time to be on net. Bamao (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2009 (UTC) An Obama fan started a massive attack here adding only sablons and templates to my talkpage, and attempting zero steps to start a normal discussion on my talkpage that I requested from him, check the history of talkpage. It is unacceptable and proves that he lacks of any normal attitude. Bamao (talk) 19:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

AN/I

Courtesy notice, I've reported this account to WP:AN/I as an apparent sockpuppet. Thx, - Wikidemon (talk) 20:32, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

NW (Talk) 21:10, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

copy from administrators noticeboard: "You know I'm such an idiot that I hadn't even realized that the username is an anagram of "Obama", which would of rung a much bigger set of alarm bells." It is a personal attack, my name is bamao, I can't responsible that my parent's name is also bamao. I'm moreover a little surprised that I have seen no evidence, no proof, nothing for the statement that I am a sockpuppet, this raising many questions for the good faith of admins.

Decline reason:

WP:AGF isn't WP:BEOBLIVIOUS. Your edits are far too similar to MultiplyPerfect to not pass the WP:DUCK test. In fact, as far as I can tell, you don't even dispute this. Smashville^talk 21:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"In fact, as far as I can tell, you don't even dispute this." You are lying, check my talkpage's history, I exactly said, that: "Lost text, I don't know that user. If you want somehting then write to me on my talkpage". And your check was quite fast, I would assume that you have checked nothing, what is raising many red falgs for me.

Decline reason:

At this time, we have so many users who are solely interested in disparaging Barack Obama that it is sometimes difficult to tell them apart. Whether you are the same user, or just a different person with the same unhelpful editing pattern, these edits don't make the encyclopedia better, so unblocking you doesn't seem appropriate to me. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:12, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.