Barak Sh

Assessment

Hi. I see that you have been assessing quite a few physics articles lately. Thank you for that, the physics wikiproject needs a lot more editors doing assessments. I do however invite you to read the project importance guidelines. Some of your assessment seem to have a particular bias towards GR related topics, so I urge you to be both aware of your bias and critical of your own judgement, when assessing articles. I do want to thank you again for taking the effort to actually do some assessments in the first place. (TimothyRias (talk) 12:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC))

Thanks - I admit I wasn't aware of these guidelines. I assure you that my future assessments will obey the importance guidelines, and will of course not be biased. (See also Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Wacky assessments) Barak Sh (talk) 12:27, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

questions at Talk:Circle of fifths#Problem

I'm not so sure, but thanks for fixing up the formatting. I was glad to see you asking those questions and, since I see you are a musician, was wondering if you could look at a few of my own questions about the same table at Talk:Circle of fifths#Problem. --Jtir (talk) 01:00, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Red Circuit

A tag has been placed on Red Circuit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Blowdart | ^talk 19:17, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Help

Hi, I'm posting this on your (and other members of the Maths Wikiproject) talk as we need editors who are knowledgeable about Mathematics to evaluate the following discussion and check out the editors and articles affected. Please follow the link below and comment if you can help.

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Block_review_-_uninvolved_admin_request.

Thankyou. Exxolon (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Re Sa'adiah Shoshani

It's fine to propose the article for deletion, but that is done by inserting the template, without removing the contents at the same time. You need to leave the contents there, for others to evaluate whether they agree. Then, when consensus is reached, the article is deleted. I'm reverting you a second time (if someone else hasn't already done so), and then, go ahead, insert the template, but leave the contents as-is. If you haven't done so, it's a good idea to leave a note on the talk page about your opinion about the article, as well. --NorwegianBlue ^talk 19:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm an admin at the Hebrew Wikipedia, and usually when a machine-translated article appears, we delete it immediately. It is also customary in the Hebrew Wiki to replace the whole article with the deletion template. I'm sorry if I did anything wrong. Anyway, this article is obviously a machine translation and should be deleted immediately. Barak Sh (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Also see Wikipedia:Translation: "Wikipedia consensus is that an unedited machine translation, left as a Wikipedia article, is worse than nothing". Barak Sh (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Someone has moved the article to a subpage in someone else's userspace, so I presume there is a collaboration going on to improve the translation(?). Anyway, it's out of the article main space now, so the current problem is solved. If you want an article to be removed immediately, it would have to meet one of the criteria at Category:Speedy deletion templates (and again, leave the contents, and let an admin delete it). --NorwegianBlue ^talk 20:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

א0 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect א0. Since you had some involvement with the א0 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of Red Circuit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red Circuit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Circuit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:42, 2 January 2021 (UTC)