BarcelonaMarc

1902 Copa del Rey

Arbitration has been requested. Djln--Djln 23:29, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration request

As you may have seen, the Arbitration Committee decided not to hear the arbitration case that was recently filed against you. Several of the arbitrators recommended that you pursue other forms of dispute resolution if you and other editors on the page are not able to resolve the editing issue on your own. You might want to consider obtaining a third opinion on this issue. Good luck. Regards, Newyorkbrad 20:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

• see Wikipedia:Third opinion

Djln

Barcelona

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Barcelona. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. What are you doing? You removed half the article, including large amounts of sourced material and the entire external links and babel links section, and you repeatedly did it after you were reverted. Nyttend 13:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry for that: I only saw that you deleted a ton of material without realising that you simply were deleting duplicate information. Nyttend 13:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

• No problem, have a good day --BarcelonaMarc 13:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflict

My revert of you was unintentional. I had meant to revert Maitedebarcelona, but there was a server lag and the effect was to revert you by mistake. Sunray 21:54, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

• • Ok thanks, have a nice day.--BarcelonaMarc 21:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pillina

A tag has been placed on Pillina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja _talk 15:01, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Terrillja[[User ==Speedy deletion nomination of Central Garden & Pet==

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Central Garden & Pet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} at the top of the article, immediately below the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate), and providing your reasons for contesting on the article's talk page, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

You may want to read the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Mean as custard (talk) 13:06, 13 December 2010 (UTC)Talk:Terrillja| _talk]] 15:06, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!