Barnabas2009

Placing the same message in multiple places is not very productive. It would be better to place the information on the talk page of the article (as you did) and then place a link to that page so that people can respond in the same place instead of on multiple individual talk pages.  Frank  |  talk  18:03, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

You've already stated this exact argument. There's no need to repost it everywhere. Especially since we have a a policy against canvassing. --Bfigura ^(talk) 18:10, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

potential conflict of interest

{{ If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dr Prabhat Das Foundation, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 05:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)