Barrycaldwell
April 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ben Silverman, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ben Silverman was changed by Barrycaldwell (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-04-17T21:37:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:37, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rob Lowe. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Isaacsf (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Promotional Artwork Those-who-kill.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Promotional Artwork Those-who-kill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:20, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi, just to answer your questions: It really would be better if there is a written source, that clearly provides the information you give. But you say, you work on the series, which is good. I actually don't know how we handle peaople, working direct on a subject of an article. There are paied writers, which are actually not quite welcome here on wikipedia. As I guess, you provide information freely and it's not you boss telling you "write that down on Wikipedia!", it can be okay if you make changes and cleary state again in the edit summary "I work on the series". Thin with Imdb is found on Wikipedia:Citing IMDb for example. Therefore, IMDb is en editable database like wikipedia, there is much wrong information on there. Also, you wrote down "10 Episodes" in the infobox, but that was already stated in the text (you may havent read that, but it's already in since a long time). And the infobox always just cotains the number of episodes that have aired already, and as I already stated on the revert: thats 0 for now. You might start a discussion on Creating Talk:Reverie (TV series), not on my page and wait, if there is someone else answering you. Provite some information there that you think, needs to be in the article. Maybe you really got something the article could really need. But as said, on most occasions it's more welcome if there are citeable (written) sources that cleary state facts.--Robberey1705 (talk) 01:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)