Barrymanitoba

Why are you reverting so many good faith edits without any sort of an explanation? It's pretty rude.Freshfighter9^talk 19:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello, I'm Hulmem. I noticed that you recently removed content from Adam Schlesinger without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see the referenced MOS sections and other remarks in my edit summary of the rollback. Please remember to provide a rationale for your future edits in the edit summary. Thanks for your good faith efforts to edit Wikipedia. hulmem (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Schlesinger. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. You must provide an edit summary with a rationale for material changes, and citations for added or changed facts. hulmem (talk) 23:33, 29 January 2019 (UTC)