May 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Category:Layout engines has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wikipelli Talk 02:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Moving pages

edit

I've noticed that you've been moving a lot of pages recently, and I think I can give you some useful advice regarding move such as Category:Layout enginesCategory:Web browser engines. In this case, what you did was create a new category and systematically changed all links on the affected pages to the new category. It would have been easier to simply move the page and let all current links redirect.
--Gyrobo (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I did that intentionally because web browser engines are a subset of layout engines. Therefore it is never wrong to put a page describing a web browser engine in Category:Layout engines but it is wrong to put a page describing a layout engine which is not a web browser engine in Category:Web browser engines. I chose to validate the move to a more specific category manually for each page to preserve correctness. Had I done what you suggest, Panorama (Layout Engine) would have ended up in the wrong place and I wouldn't have known. I think it is important to maintain correctness through each edit when you are in a renaming process that takes weeks, in order not to confuse other users. Thanks for the tip though. Barsamin (talk) 00:35, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Layout engine for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Layout engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Layout engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellerpm (talkcontribs) 00:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply