Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.


You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for editing in violation of WP:SCRUTINY. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. WilliamH (talk) 04:12, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Note that this is a CheckUser block, and any unblock requests should be dealt with only by a CheckUser. WilliamH (talk) 04:19, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

August 2012

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-appeals-en lists.wikimedia.org. Elen of the Roads (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)

edit

The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.

  • Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
  • Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
  • If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:20, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Marcus Hardie for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcus Hardie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcus Hardie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:10, 8 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU

edit

  Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:IDONTLIKEYOU during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bobherry Talk Edits 03:21, 14 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Editorials

edit

  Wikipedia:Editorials, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editorials and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Editorials during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jc86035 (talk) 14:09, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Template:User campus ambassador

edit

  Template:User campus ambassador, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User campus ambassador and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User campus ambassador during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 21:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:User Good Article Significant

edit

 Template:User Good Article Significant has been nominated for merging with Template:User Good Article. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of William Hamman for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Hamman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hamman (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 13:19, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply