User talk:Bastun/2014
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Bastun. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
June 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of members of the Irish Republican Army may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * Patrick Brennan, convicted of social welfare fraud.<ref>{{cite web|url={{cite web|url=http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/dad-of-six-previously-
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Request
There's a lot of bad faith here and I wonder if, on such a sensitive topic, you could exercise a little more restraint in stating what you think the motives of other editors are? --John (talk) 08:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- By implication, that editor is asserting that Corless' daughter has been maintaining a fake social media/blog presence for years. They're relying on an appalling Irish Times article that is contradicted by the video available from the very same page and misquoting Corless herself. I think my conclusions are accurate. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 08:53, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
- No, I said that Wikipedia doesn't usually consider Twitter accounts and personal blogs to be reliable sources, especially since their authorship cannot usually be verified; which isn't the same thing as accusing this specific Twitter account of being fraudulent. I just meant that we can't verify it, and wouldn't normally be able to use it as a source for a Wikipedia article anyway. As for the idea that the Irish Times article was falsified: my latest response on the Bon Secours Home talk page today addressed that issue (in a nutshell, the video doesn't contradict the text, and you haven't proved your serious allegation that Boland falsified the article). I would add that this debate is rapidly getting out of hand, given that you've been spreading accusations about me on three different talk pages. I don't know how many of these talk pages I should respond to, since we really need to keep the debate on the Bon Secours article's talk page alone. Ryn78 (talk) 00:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Baile na nGall, Waterford
Can you please explain why you have reverted this page to an older version and canceled the additions made to it? Its hard to write a page if people keep undoing your work for no apparent reason Gaelmise (talk) 15:13, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Straw Poll
There is a straw poll that may interest you regarding the proper use of "Religion =" in infoboxes of atheists.
The straw poll is at Template talk:Infobox person#Straw poll.