Baternik

Baternik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Baternik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Genghis Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jurchen

Heqin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jurchen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genghis Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jurchen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uprising of the Five Barbarians, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Di and Jie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mongolia under Qing rule (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chahar

Transition from Ming to Qing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chahar

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tuoba into Northern and Southern dynasties. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding blocks of material

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Thanks for working on a number of articles, especially Qing dynasty. However, I removed a large block from the Military section, as I explained on the Talk Page, where you are of course free to discuss (that is, not here). However, I will add here that you need to explain any and all of your edits in the edit summary, so that other editors can understand what you have done and why. All the best! ch (talk)

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajmaan, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Leonel Johnson (talk) 06:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)