This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baz Lurpack (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not a sock-puppet. This Daily Mail issue is clearly such a sore point for the Wikipedia establishment that they're quite willing to falsify logs etc. Baz Lurpack (talk) 06:57, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Based on the account's edit history, Baz Lurpack is an obvious sockpuppet of Brian K Horton and MickMacNee. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brian K Horton for details. — Newslinger talk 07:12, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

October 2020

edit
 
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 — Newslinger talk 07:13, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Newslinger: Are you sure that when you altered the block you wanted it to expire after 1 day? Victor Schmidt (talk) 07:17, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
  Fixed. One day was the Twinkle default, and I had accidentally overlooked it. Thanks for pointing this out. — Newslinger talk 07:19, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply