December 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Shrek (character)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 05:09, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Greenville High School (Michigan) with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jab843 (talk) 05:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Entomophaga nigrohalterata, you may be blocked from editing. Jab843 (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shrek (character).
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Shrek (character) was changed by Bbisgod333 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.943136 on 2015-12-05T05:29:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 05:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

BROTHER — Preceding unsigned comment added by BBISGOD335 (talkcontribs) 06:51, 13 December 2015 (UTC)Reply