Bcush99

Bcush99/OLES2129

Activity 1 Tutorial 3: Wikipedia Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seattle_Computer_Products Currently this Page is rated a Start-Class rating for quality, to elevate this pages rating to an A-Class level it would need to delve into its success and compare it toward competitors, whether that be in Seattle or in other cities and states in America. Further, Page Layout would need to be considered in order to improve this Page, it currently only has one heading which is "Corporate History". Perhaps, subheadings such as: - "Current Success" - "Products on Offer" - "Finance" - Marketing etc Peer review would also help improve the WikiPage and become more informative for the reader.

Activity 4: Tag, you're it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Cornell_Law_School#Citation_needed_for_Statistic

Tutorial 5 Featured Article Activity: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sind_sparrow 5 Points about The Sind Sparrow: −Large sized reference list (43 sources) - 6 point content box- chronologically ordered - The Lead paragraph summaries the background of the Sind Sparrow, its place of origin, heritage, and the role it plays in the ecosystem with great summary, this provides a brief overview into the next 6 sections of the wiki page. - Structure- very good flow, starts with the lead, then goes to the description, followed by the bulk information about the Sind Sparrow such as its background, role in the ecosystem and how it fits into nation. Follows a well written narrative structure. - Throughout the whole page there are a large number of citations, this follows legal copyrighting practises.

Own personal Article:

Citation styles

Hi, I just bumped into Neomammalian brain. We don't use <sup> to make citations, there is the dedicated <ref> tag instead. There's a lot of information at Citing Sources. In particular, you can provide a name parameter, allowing you to reuse the reference.

<ref name="google">{{cite web|url=https://www.google.co.uk|title=Google}}</ref>
<ref name="google" />

Like so.
These can then be accumulated in a {{reflist}} at the end. If you prefer, you can use List-defined references, where you provide the full references as a |refs= parameter to {{reflist}}.
The format I've converted the references to is also an option. This format is called Shortened footnotes. It was the closest to what you had done. However, it's generally best for longer articles, where the same source is used, but different pages of the source are referenced. It's perfectly fine, though. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 13:57, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

References

Another hint

To make links to wikipedia articles, just put two square brackets on each side of the text. See Help:Link. As for the content of your article, I believe it would be better incorporated into Triune brain. I don't think you need to reiterate anatomy in the current article or in my proposed one, but speak to the role of the NMC as relates to the theory. Outriggr (talk) 02:01, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia and Wikiproject Medicine

Welcome to Wikipedia! We have compiled some guidance for new healthcare editors:

1. Please keep the mission of Wikipedia in mind. We provide the public with accepted knowledge, working in a community.
2. We do that by finding high quality secondary sources and summarizing what they say, giving WP:WEIGHT as they do. Please do not try to build content by synthesizing content based on primary sources.
3. Please use high-quality, recent, secondary sources for medical content (see WP:MEDRS; for the difference between primary and secondary sources, see the WP:MEDDEF section.) High-quality sources include review articles (which are not the same as peer-reviewed), position statements from nationally and internationally recognized bodies (like CDC, WHO, FDA), and major medical textbooks. Lower-quality sources are typically removed. Please beware of predatory publishers – check the publishers of articles (especially open source articles) at Beall's list.
4. The ordering of sections typically follows the instructions at WP:MEDMOS. The section above the table of contents is called the WP:LEAD. It summarizes the body. Do not add anything to the lead that is not in the body. Style is covered in MEDMOS as well; we avoid the word "patient" for example.
5. We don't use terms like "currently", "recently," "now", or "today". See WP:RELTIME.
6. More generally see WP:MEDHOW, which gives great tips for editing about health -- for example, it provides a way to format citations quickly and easily
7. Citation details are important:
   • Be sure cite the PMID for journal articles and ISBN for books
   • Please include page numbers when referencing a book or long journal article, and please format citations consistently within an article.
   • Do not use URLs from your university library that have "proxy" in them: the rest of the world cannot see them.
   • Reference tags generally go after punctuation, not before; there is no preceding space.
8. We use very few capital letters (see WP:MOSCAPS) and very little bolding. Only the first word of a heading is usually capitalized.
9. Common terms are not usually wikilinked; nor are years, dates, or names of countries and major cities. Avoid overlinking!\
10. Never copy and paste from sources; we run detection software on new edits.
11. Talk to us! Wikipedia works by collaboration at articles and user talkpages.

Once again, welcome, and thank you for joining us! Please share these guidelines with other new editors.

– the WikiProject Medicine team Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 22:47, 24 October 2018 (UTC)