Be-nice:-)
Advantages of Christian Science
edit"Some advantages of Christian Science over conventional medicine include the fact that Christian Science healing is not reliant on the controversial practice of animal testing, nor does it involve massive state expenditure on health care, or the risk of "iatrogenic" (physician- or hospital-induced) ailments."
This is at best original research and at worst pure speculation. It may seem logically obvious, but Christian Science does not speak to this issue nor, to my knowledge, does the iatrogenic literature speak to Christian Science. At any rate it's not appropriate in the article on Christian Science. Digitalican 19:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Theology
editI really do encourage you to try your hand at Christian Science theology (or Draft:Christian Science theology if you prefer). I know it would be hard to avoid an original-research-ish tone, and hard to find good secondary sources, but it would be very interesting if you could manage it, and we could summarize it in the main article.
By the way, I wondered whether you were aware of Henry W Steiger, Christian Science and Philosophy, Philosophical Library, 1948. It apparently started as a doctoral thesis for Boston University. It's the only book I've seen about CS written by a philosopher (though I haven't read it). It might be a good source for the theology article. SlimVirgin (talk) 00:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, I should have some time to have a go at this around Easter. I have actually heard of the book, though like you I haven't read it. I'll see if it's available from Amazon or the likeBe-nice:-) (talk) 01:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Idealism comment
editBN, Just alerting you that I've finally responded to your 17 August comment at CS:Talk. So sorry about the unintended delay - see comment for more. Feel free to ping me when you respond. I'm checking regularly again but it's never a bad idea. Ath271 (talk) 19:59, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Be-nice:-). Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Be-nice:-). Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
That quote does not contribute significantly to anything. I understand you seem to think the world of MBE, as your other edits seem to suggest, but this is not the place. Drmies (talk) 15:54, 16 August 2019 (UTC)