User talk:Bearcat/Archive 67
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bearcat. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 60 | ← | Archive 65 | Archive 66 | Archive 67 | Archive 68 | Archive 69 | Archive 70 |
Nomination of Don Martin (journalist) for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Martin (journalist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
February 2022
Hello admin, regarding Lovell Adams-Gray, I think the article needs cleanup as it is written like a promo in the opening statement. my opinion Neo the Twin (talk) 19:38, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
The Exchange Accolades
Hello Bearcat! I believe you are wrong in asserting that the academy.ca can't be used as references for the award being nominated, indeed it is used regularly to establish that fact for films/TV/& people, as you can see in multiple examples using a search with "Academy.ca" here at Wikipedia. Like here, here, here & here just for a random few examples. The fact it is their site & self published would only be a negative if it was in an article about them, not someone else. So removal of those References seems to go very much against the norm. You've also altered the names of the awards, they now contradict what even the remaining Reference refers to them as. Lastly, I left the Refs split in that table despite them applying to all three because if one or more of the nominees wins but not all, there's likely to be more Refs for the winners. So separate entries would make adding new Refs more accessible, though I can see why you would have thought to join them. Take care, LooksGreatInATurtleNeck (talk) 15:47, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Lea Carlson
Hello Bearcat! Not sure if you plan expanding the Lea Carlson page you created but if you are, you may be interested in Virginia and Myrtle Cooper Award in Costume Design given to film and telivision costume designer Lea Carlson at ontarioartsfoundation.on.ca as it contains some info on the subject & could make a useful Reference. Found while researching info for The Exchange article. Take care, LooksGreatInATurtleNeck (talk) 10:34, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Renasant Financial Partners for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renasant Financial Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Speedy deletion nomination of Oraclepoll Research
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Oraclepoll Research requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Laptopinmyhands (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Werk
All you do is serve. I see you all over this site. Saw you early in the edit history of the Elassoma gilberti and had to come and let you know. You are a star. You've got chutzpah. Keep on shining. Isthistwisted (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
You declined this draft, but I think I got it tightened up and in shape, with a big hand from User:Uncle G. Because of the nature of the decline, I was wondering if you could take another quick glance at it before I move it to mainspace. I think there are more than enough reviews to cover WP:NCREATIVE#3 at this point. Thanks for your time. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:00, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Just a heads up, I moved this over to article space. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
You get a barnstar!
|
The Socratic Barnstar | |
| For your argument in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrototypeRadio. Truly one of the most eloquent and well spoken posts I have seen in my time on Wikipedia. Sea Cow (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC) |
Your response to my "Categories named after writers."
A more concise explanation could not have been hoped for! -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 13:07, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
Proposed re deletion of musician oage
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benn_Jordan
This musician is not notable. He previously had his page removed. I suggest it be put up for deletion if not summarily deleted Canrock9999 (talk) 18:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
- The sourcing in it isn't brilliant, but (a) I can find no evidence that it's ever been deleted in the past (I'm an administrator, which means I have the ability to track such things), and (b) I don't know why you're bringing this to my attention as if I had anything to do with it. Bearcat (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Jane Christmas for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Christmas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
New administrator activity requirement
The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
- Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
- Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
The article Shine True has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Noble effort, but no sources exist beyond announcement of its premire. No technical info like debut date or number of episodes
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Gloabl Playhouse
Hi, could we exchange info about the Global Playhouse article? I have several more sources, but I don't know how to edit Wikipedia. I also can not access several of the cited sources because I live outside Toronto and cant access the public library archives there. If you get his could you please email me? themoneyhuntreward@gmail.com. Thanks!
Hi, I was revising a pending edit (diff for the revise) and you reverted it under pending reviewer. Was the addition of the CBC story objected to, or was my edit caught in the revert of the pending edit? Best wishes, Solipsism 101 (talk) 19:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Drop protection
Hi! I think we could try unprotecting Hypermail, it's been in statis since 2013. --Palosirkka (talk) 08:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)