Bearjsnj

Welcome!

Hello, Bearjsnj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Altos, Brazil, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty-- (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Altos, Brazil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Altos, Brazil. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Altos, Piauí. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Altos, Piauí – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. --Animalparty-- (talk) 02:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Altos,Brazil.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Altos,Brazil.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Altos.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Altos.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of On New River

The article On New River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and incomprehensible, possibly a machine translation.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zanhe (talk) 00:26, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of This is the user sandbox of Bearjsnj. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. For a sandbox of your own, create it here.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Piguy101 (talk) 01:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of North River Avenue

The article North River Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-remarkable street

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaroleHenson (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jianghan Hall

The article Jianghan Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

confusing content - hard to determine notability - unable to find information about this place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaroleHenson (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wang Hanzhou

The article Wang Hanzhou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find information about this place

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaroleHenson (talk) 05:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Wang Hanzhou) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wang Hanzhou, Bearjsnj!

Wikipedia editor CaroleHenson just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

There are some questions posted on Talk:Wang Hanzhou to help clarify the nature of the article and its notability.

To reply, leave a comment on CaroleHenson's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:On New River.jpeg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:On New River.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 08:42, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jianghan Hall

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Bearjsnj, thanks for creating Jianghan Hall!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It's difficult to figure out how this is notable. Is there any more information about it's historical significance - or anything that makes it notable as compared to other Qing Dynasty structures in Nanjing?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 09:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of On New River

The article On New River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The subject is not clear. What is "On New River" - road, riverbank, other? Even "New River" is unclear, is it Quinhai River? Or Xinhe? Or another "New River" (possibly aka canal)? Having a very hard time finding "New River" for Nanjing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CaroleHenson (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Jianghan Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jianghan Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jianghan Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaroleHenson (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from North River Avenue. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CaroleHenson (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from On New River. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CaroleHenson (talk) 14:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Jianghan Hall. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. CaroleHenson (talk) 14:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

I truly would like to see that these articles are notable, but so far it doesn't appear to be so. Is there a book somewhere that describes these places and why they are important? There is a mention of cultural protection sites near these sites. If there is something from a historical preservation agency about these sites, that would be a good start.

So far, though, I am not understanding what makes these sites notable for an article. One of the articles was nominated for deletion and the deletion goes through a review process. The other two On New River and North River Avenue can be run through that same process. Then, others provide their opinions about whether the article should stay or be deleted (in other words, the decision is made by consensus). That may be the way to go if we cannot resolve the questions.--CaroleHenson (talk) 15:06, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve Wang Hanzhou

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Bearjsnj, thanks for creating Wang Hanzhou!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The notability is not clear. The source is an encyclopedia article. There is no corresponding article on the Chinese version of Wikipedia.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 17:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Wang Hanzhou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wang Hanzhou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Hanzhou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaroleHenson (talk) 17:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Suggestion

Sorry to blast you with so many tags... I've been trying to sort out all four articles (On New River, North River Avenue, Wang Hanzhou and Jianghan Hall) and the detective work has been contagious. It seems that there are issues with notability for the separate articles, but I'm wondering if the Jianye District article could be expanded to provide more information about the cultural influences from the Qing Dynasty and earlier dynasties. It would likely be much easier to find reliable sources and perhaps link into what I think your underlying point is about the historical significance of the area. It seems information about the "New River", which I'm guessing is one or more of the canals or channels, would be interesting, too - again, with good sources and clear identification of what body of water we'd be talking about.

I'll hunt around a bit taking that tack and see what I can come up with. Any suggestions or thoughts about that approach?--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Jianghan Hall. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 00:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve National Revolutionary Army Memorial Cemetery

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Bearjsnj, thanks for creating National Revolutionary Army Memorial Cemetery!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a much better worded article! Bad news, though, is that is still doesn't have reliable sources, like books, magazines, or other good secondary sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 01:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wang Muzong

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Wang Muzong requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. --Finngall ^talk 02:17, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Ways to improve National Revolutionary Army Memorial Cemetery

Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. Bearjsnj, thanks for creating National Revolutionary Army Memorial Cemetery!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please do not return invalid sources: Chinese wikipedia is not a valid source; the fact that it's tagged for not having sources is even more of a problem; also, continuing to use a source already declared to be an issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. CaroleHenson (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of North River Avenue for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article North River Avenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North River Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaroleHenson (talk) 03:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Guangxu Emperor, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. There have been many warnings about removal of maintenance tags, without resolving the issues, and deletion notices - per this talk page. CaroleHenson (talk) 04:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of หา

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on หา requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  GILO   A&E⇑ 04:39, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited On New River, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New River, Warm and Prosperous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of Google Street View. Please don't remove maintenance tags. They are there for a reason. It's far better to first resolve the issue. In this case, there's a cool tool to resolve disambiguation issues: http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Dablinks - if you'd like to run it for this article and clean it up so that the tags could be removed, that would be great! CaroleHenson (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jianghan Hall, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. It's not helping your cause to remove the deletion notification, because the discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Log/2014_May_10#Jianghan_Hall. CaroleHenson (talk) 10:54, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You have received numerous messages advising you how you can help fix the problems in various articles, and you have been advised not to remove maintenance tags without fixing the problems they refer to. However, you continue to do so, and you have not responded to any of the many messages that have been left trying to help you edit productively. I advise you to try communicating with your fellow Wikipedians -- it's as simple as editing this talk page and adding your replies. —Darkwind (talk) 11:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of New River, Nanjing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New River, Nanjing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New River, Nanjing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 18:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Jiangxin Island

Hi there,

You've inspired me to work on more Nanjing articles, which has been fun - like I've been visiting the Temple of Confucius, Nanjing and other articles. Today, I created a new one Jiangxin Island.

I've been doing searches and using http://map.baidu.com/ and google maps for the island to try to identify notable places.

It may serve as an example of the types of sources we've been talking about... (although I have a question about some I posted on Talk:Jiangxin Island.)

But it would be interesting to know if you know of something that's notable about the island, now or historically, that's not in the article now that is remarkable should be researched for good sources. If so, it would be good to hear from you!--CaroleHenson (talk) 02:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

我希望这是有道理的:

您好，

你启发了我对南京多条，这一直是有趣的工作 - 就像我一直逛孔庙，南京等物品。今天，我创建了一个新的江心岛。

我一直在做搜索和使用http://map.baidu.com/和谷歌地图的岛屿，试图找出值得注意的地方。

它可以作为来源，我们一直在谈论...类型的例子（虽然我有一些我贴在通话问题：江心岛）

但是，这将是有趣的知道，如果你知道的东西，这就是著名的岛屿，现在还是在历史上，这不是在文章中，现在是显着的，应进行研究的良好来源。如果是这样，这将是很好的听到你的声音 - ！CaroleHenson（谈话）01:53，2014年5月13日（UTC）

Barisal District

Good job finding a reliable source for the Barisal District. It was reverted by another user because the source did not say that Barisal was the "headquarters" of Barisal District, which is mentioned here. This source is now added to the article.

Even so, it was a good step forward in finding good sources.--CaroleHenson (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Basaltic Lake Park

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Basaltic Lake Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever (addition: once inaccurate information and place name was removed), or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. CaroleHenson (talk) 16:22, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Additional note added above - it was blank after inaccurate information and place name was removed.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:34, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Basaltic site, Xuanwu Lake

Although Basaltic Lake Park is not the name of a place in Nanjing, there is a basaltic (volcanic) site in Xuanwu Lake, so a redirect was established... and I added some information about the basaltic site to the Xuanwu Lake article.

I don't know if you're working on articles for the Chinese version of Wikipedia, but if so, I would be happy to take a look at what you've successfully posted there and make an English version article. That might be another way to go, since I am getting the impression that Chinese is your first language.--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:27, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with New River, Nanjing. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 11:52, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Xianlin

Xianlin was a good topic, which is the first and best step to creating a new article. Good job! I thought I'd add a couple of points here, hoping you find them helpful.

Item	Comment	Good approach
Topic	Xianlin University City is a good topic: it's a notable subject, easy to find good sources, and it's on the map	Yes
Title	Xianlin was an incomplete title, based upon google searches and the map, the title of the area is Xianlin University City. Xianlin University Town is used sometimes, which is pretty much the same thing.	Renamed to Xianlin University City
Content	Most of the content was unreadable and from poor sources	The content needed to be rewritten
Sources	http://baike.baidu.com/ is not a reliable source, which has been explained several times	No
	https://zh.wikipedia.org/ cannot be a source, it's a circular reference and not a "reliable source" by definition.	No
	Sources from https://zh.wikipedia.org/ article. If, though, there were sources on this page that were reliable sources, those could be used in the article. In this case, (https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BB%99%E6%9E%97%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%A6%E5%9F%8E) there were no sources used, just posting of external links	No inline sources that tied to the article content

--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:19, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Article summary

There are a lot of tags for articles you've started, so I thought I'd summarize how things are looking:

• New River, Nanjing (renamed from On New River)- Nominated for deletion - trending towards deletion (notability issue)
• Jianghan Hall - Nominated for deletion - trending towards deletion (notability issue)
• North River Avenue - Nominated for deletion - trending towards deletion (notability issue)
• Wang Hanzhou - Nominated for deletion - trending towards keep due to clarification of notability and a lot of work by Philg88
• National Revolutionary Army Memorial Cemetery - A good topic. It's in better shape with reliable sources, rewording, etc.
• Basaltic site, Xuanwu Lake is a redirect to Xuanwu Lake - the previous Basaltic Lake Park was deleted because it's not a real place. There is a general mention of a basaltic site now in the Xuanwu Lake article, but I'm not sure of its exact location (perhaps one of the islands / islets?)
• Xianlin University City, as mentioned is a good topic and something that could be worked with to clean up.

--CaroleHenson (talk) 18:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Xianlin Avenue

Hello, Bearjsnj,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Xianlin Avenue should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xianlin Avenue .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, FriendlyCaribou (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Another breakdown, this time Xianlin Avenue

Item	Comment	Good approach
Topic	Xianlin Avenue's notability isn't clear and it's rare to have articles just about streets, unless there's some historical, cultural or other impacts that are significant. An example is Fifth Avenue. Since there's no content in the article to state it's importance, it has been nominated for deletion. Do you have more information to prove its importance?	?
Title	Good
Content	It needs a little copyediting
Sources	A better job with reliable sources	Yes

--CaroleHenson (talk) 16:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)