In reply to your message in your edit summary, User:DivaNtrainin has already received a warning about edit warring, so there was no need for me to give a second warning. Now that both of you have been warned, hopefully you can resolve your disagreement on the talk page. Now that there is a discussion on the talk page, I will block DivaNtrainin if s/he reverts again. In that case, I recommend that you wait for someone else to revert DivaNtrainin's edits so that you don't get blocked for edit warring too. I should also remind you that being an editor of an article for longer does not give you ownership of it. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks Jeffery. Your sort of coercing me into having a talk page eh? I prefer to just add citations instead of my opinions. I only meant to imply that a person who vigorously edits an article is unlikely to vandalize or insert bias comments, then say, somebody who shows up for one edit. I think you'd agree with me here. Nobody owns articles. I've seen even Administrators get banned because they allowed their personal feelings to interfere in their judgements. It happens. My sarcasm might have offended you though so for that I apologize. Its a lot of work to administrator pages and I appreciate all the work you put in and other editors here, especially given how abusing people can be. Yes, I started a discussion about this particular incident and yes I'll take your advice and back off on this issue and let others decide. Beebopherewego (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)