User talk:BegbertBiggs/Archive 1

Archive 1

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BegbertBiggs. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! –72 _(talk) 14:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BegbertBiggs. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Did you know nomination of Franco-German University

Thank you for your nomination of the Franco-German University article. Could you please review the outstanding issues at the nomination page? Thank you. Moonraker (talk) 01:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Names of non-English-speaking universities

I noticed your move of Ludwigsburg University to University of Education Ludwigsburg, with the edit summary "more appropriate translation". We should not be naming pages in that way, we should follow the policy at Wikipedia:Article titles. That says, for instance, "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources. This includes usage in the sources used as references for the article." (In this case there are no sources used as references, as pointed out by a hatnote.)

I had to face up to this problem not long ago when I created the page Orange College of Breda, about a college with a bewildering variety of names, and I know it's far from easy, but we should at least do a check on the English-language reliable sources, rather than just making a translation. In this case, there certainly are some hits for "University of Education Ludwigsburg", although I think more for "University of Education, Ludwigsburg", which follows the English-language pattern of using commas in a proper noun like this. In many cases, the common name in English is easy to find, and rather often it does not translate the name in the foreign language. Moonraker (talk) 05:48, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

@Moonraker: The main reason for my move is the rather important distinction between a "normal" (general) university and specifically a University of Education. I didn't give much thought to the details and alternatives like "University of Education, Ludwigsburg" or "Ludwigsburg University of Education". I originally based my choice on the University of Education Karlsruhe article — which I have now also moved to better reflect their self-declared English name. BegbertBiggs (talk) - de 13:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Okay, but the principle of "ab uno disce omnes" can't really be applied in this context. I found and added some reliable English-language sources for the page, and as they were using Ludwigsburg University of Education I moved it to that. Moonraker (talk) 01:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Élysée Treaty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tagesschau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Franco-German University) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Franco-German University, BegbertBiggs!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A well-written article and a useful addition to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much! BegbertBiggs (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Franco-German University

On 8 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Franco-German University, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Franco-German University facilitates the cooperation of over 180 universities and colleges across international borders? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Franco-German University. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Franco-German University), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:13, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Precious

Franco-German friendship

Thank you for quality articles such as Franco-German University and List of Chancellors of Germany, for improving Élysée Treaty, for welcoming new users, and fighting vandalism and advertising, for a good infobox about your user, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Oh, thank you so much! I'm honoured. BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:03, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1898 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

FLC

Earlier i made edits to the List of Chancellors of Germany.Can you please explain to me what is FLC and why the article has been changed so much.Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.176.46.191 (talk) 17:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

How do get consesus

Could you please respond in your talk page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.176.46.191 (talk) 18:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

FLC stands for Featured List Candidate. This means that it is going through the process of becoming a featured list on Wikipedia. As part of that process, a bunch of changes were made by myself and others. Here is the discussion page, you can leave comments there if you like. BegbertBiggs (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

SAATM

Hi --

I noticed that User:BegbertBiggs/SAATM is a draft for an article on the Single African Air Transport Market. It's obviously not complete, but looks sufficient to be an article now. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:06, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi power~enwiki – thank you for considering my draft worthy of being an article, and I like that you created Yamoussoukro Decision. I prefer work on my article a little bit more and especially add some prose, rather than publishing a stub right away. It won't take long though! BegbertBiggs (talk) 15:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Single African Air Transport Market

On 16 May 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Single African Air Transport Market, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Single African Air Transport Market, which was launched in 2018, was almost 30 years in the making? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Single African Air Transport Market. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Single African Air Transport Market), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Widr (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BegbertBiggs. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, BegbertBiggs. I'm just posting to let you know that List of Chancellors of Germany – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for January 14, 2019. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Aircraft noise pollution

Many thanks for sorting out the problem with the new title. I've never moved a page before, and haven't quite got the drill. Valetude (talk) 19:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:BegbertBiggs/Quarks

Hello, BegbertBiggs. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Quarks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. N4izL3etsP44k (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

About User:BegbertBiggs/People

I am currently cleaning up Category:Pages with DEFAULTSORT conflicts, and one of your page is in it. Could you <nowiki> {{DEFAULTSORT}}s in your page? – Ase1este^t@lk_c0ntribs 11:04, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Hedwig Porschütz

Hello! Your submission of Hedwig Porschütz at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Morgan695 (talk) 02:54, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monika Forstinger

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Monika Forstinger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NNADIGOODLUCK (Talk|Contribs) 22:52, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	Thank you very much for improving structure and syntax of the Fortification of Frankfurt article! I am amazed by the result of community collaboration. It is a heartwarming experience to see the third of our five pillars so clearly in practice; I feel the spirit of Wikipedia in every paragraph of the text. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:25, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

♥ – BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:40, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Hedwig Porschütz

On 29 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hedwig Porschütz, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Hedwig Porschütz, who rescued Jews during the Holocaust, was not honoured as an "unsung heroine" in West Berlin because she had been a prostitute? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hedwig Porschütz. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Hedwig Porschütz), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

WiR stub contest third place

Third place: New stubs: Women in Red stub contest, November 2019

Congratulations, BegbertBiggs, with 18 acceptable new articles, you have gained third place in the new stubs section of the November contest. I suggest you include this award on you user page.--Ipigott (talk) 13:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted pending changes to August 7, October 7, December 29, and February 13 that did not include any direct sources.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the edit notice on that page, the content guideline and/or the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. All new additions without references are now being either reverted on-sight or in some cases where the patroller is especially motivated, immediately sourced. I've gone ahead and un-accepted all those edits and backed them out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you and please keep up your good work! Toddst1 (talk) 04:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, I was indeed not aware of these constraints. BegbertBiggs (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Airbus

Good afternoon,
I have seen your flag on the corruption controversy concerning Airbus.
Indeed, before you put it, I had just created this paragraph, and had no time to add and review carefully all sources I had for what I wrote.
I did it yesterday and today, and I believe the article is complete now.
Can I ask you to have a look at it?
and tell me what you think?
Thank you in advance
PS: Ich spreche auch gerne Deutsch...
--Emigré55 (talk) 11:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

@Emigré55: Looks like edits by you and others have mostly dealt with my original concerns. I have removed the tags I had placed. I have however noticed a few claims that seem to be without citations or with unclear sourcing, so I have placed inline tags there. BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

--- @ BegbertBiggs: OK, thanks. I will follow on the matter. Alles gute. --Emigré55 (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

music on my talk, listen ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 15:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hi, Sorry I just saw your message. I am still learning to use this as a project for my MSc at University. Apologies.

Gfb1987 (talk) 11:10, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Partnership Africa Canada § Requested move 9 October 2020

Hello. At Talk:Partnership Africa Canada#Requested move 9 October 2020, you added some sort of a relisting mark on 9 October 2020. I'm sure this change has a purpose, but I don't understand it. Could you please explain it to me, as perhaps I had done something wrong? Is it related to the {{Help me}} template that had since been removed at the suggestion of another editor? Your relisting mark just seems out of place, and I didn't feel like removing it without asking about it.
— Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 23:34, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi DeNoel, you didn't do anything wrong. After 7-8 days a requested move should usually either be closed (e.g. if a consensus to move or not move has been found) or relisted. Relisting extends the "deadline" and encourages further input from other editors. See WP:RMRELIST for more information. In this case the discussion had no participation from others, so I relisted it. BegbertBiggs (talk) 09:12, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

History of a move

Hi again. I'm looking into the history of a move [1]. Wondering if there was an official request, or if the editor just unilaterally made a highly controversial move - I've recently discovered other mass deletes/POV issues at Kirti Monastery by the same editor. While trying to return the page to its previous title via another request for move, the diff info was just discovered. (FYI, I just put in a request for aid at Teahouse, but since we've pinged, I thought to ask.) Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 22:25, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pasdecomplot: I don't see any discussion about the title from that time. Given that the move wasn't disputed or reverted, the editors back then probably didn't consider it very controversial ("implicit consensus"). You could move it back boldly, or it might be best to settle it with a formal requested move. BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Since the earlier move was highly controversial and without CON, I would think reverting the move is more appropriate. Then, a proper move request can be submitted if a controversy ensues.

Not sure about the technique for the bold option - is there a link to the process about redirects? There's the page title change at Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, and the revert of the redirect from '11th Panchen Lama' to '11th Panchen Lama controversy'. Pasdecomplot (talk) 13:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pasdecomplot: You should be able to move the page back here — just fill in your reasoning and click "move page". As for Gedhun Choekyi Nyima, I see you've already initiated the RM in the proper way. BegbertBiggs (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Is the process for redirects different than a move? As in, stopping all redirects for '11th Panchen Lama' to the '11th Panchen Lama controversy' page. Pasdecomplot (talk) 22:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@Pasdecomplot: By moving the page with the link I put above that redirect will automatically be deleted and replaced. BegbertBiggs (talk) 22:16, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

again, apologies for the quagmire. Reminiscent of a shadow! Regards. Pasdecomplot (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Move

Heello, Result of Fahai' page move discussion was "moved ". But it has not moved yet! Why? VocalIndia (talk) 08:18, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

@VocalIndia: Hi. I am unable to move the article for technical reasons (it requires advanced permissions). After recording that the RM discussion resulted in a "consensus to move", I listed the page at WP:RMTR. Another editor with the required permissions will come along and move the page as soon as they can. I hope this clears it up. BegbertBiggs (talk) 10:28, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

?

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AGameshowandsportsfan2007&type=revision&diff=987868379&oldid=987215156

the new user appears to be not heeding advice and archiving it then repeating. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for your contributions related to page moves. I've fixed moves concerning Greek conquests in India, and it consumed a lot of my energy. A number of bad moves there. You may try asking for move protection, and I guess it would be helpful. Regards

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 11:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

You do a lot of work at RM, why not get page mover rights?

Just a friendly suggestion, (t · c) buidhe 21:39, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

I had thought about that before, and I have made a request at WP:PERM now. Thanks for your suggestion. BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Request to close an RM you previously relisted?

Hi! Regarding this RM, it's now been almost a month with no interest whatsoever from anyone but me, so I think there's probably no problem with me unilaterally implementing the changes proposed (or whichever ones I see fit), as long as the RM has been formally closed as "unopposed" or some such. Would you mind doing that? I considered taking it to ANRFC (actually I've been considering this for about two weeks), but the formatting there seems to have changed since the last time I used it, and can't for the life of me figure out what I'm supposed to do. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:52, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I've closed the RM now since it was indeed unopposed for almost a month. BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, BegbertBiggs. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 12:43, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Updating archive bot settings when moving a page

Hi BegbertBiggs, you recently moved 9/11 truth movement and its associated talk page and archives of talk pages. In the future, when a talk page has archives, please check if automatic archiving is configured and update the |archive parameter, as I've done here. Otherwise, automatic archiving will stop working. Thank you! --rchard2scout (talk) 08:00, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

(un)Fair use images

Hey there, Begbert. Sorry about the images at List of elected and appointed female heads of state and government, and thanks for letting me know before I did any more damage elsewhere. I assumed blah blah blah instead of reading the fine print. I'll just stick to fixing typos, maybe. Hahaha. Have a cool day. Ray (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

No worries. Just make sure to double-check files' licenses and you'll be fine. BegbertBiggs (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Changes to Connect on July 10, 2020

Hi! I'm am writing about the page move for Connect insurance company. I understand the need to remove the all capitalization treatment because it is for style, but I am hoping we can change the name back to the full trademarked name: Connect, powered by American Family Insurance

This is for several reasons: 1. It is the fully trademarked name of the company. Trademark info here. 2. There are other Connect insurance companies, and it could cause confusion between the two.

Is that enough to move the name back to: Connect, powered by American Family Insurance — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brenda haines (talk • contribs) 16:20, 16 March 2021 (UTC) Brenda haines (talk) 17:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Connect insurance company move

Hi! I'm am writing about the page move for Connect insurance company. I understand the need to remove the all capitalization treatment because it is for style, but I am hoping we can change the name back to the full trademarked name: Connect, powered by American Family Insurance

This is for several reasons: 1. It is the fully trademarked name of the company. Trademark info here. 2. There are other Connect insurance companies, and it could cause confusion between the two.

Is that enough to move the name back to: Connect, powered by American Family Insurance

Brenda haines (talk) 15:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@Brenda haines: The RM discussion was pretty clear that the previous title was overly promotional. Note that trademarks are irrelevant to Wikipedia article titles. No other insurance company with that name has a Wikipedia article written about it (as far as I can tell) so it's not really ambiguous either. BegbertBiggs (talk) 16:56, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@BegbertBiggs:Thanks for the clarification. Brenda haines (talk) 17:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

@BegbertBiggs:I have opened a review of the move. After reviewing the talk on the initial review it feels like the majority of the support to have it moved was subjective and not backed by reasoning, but instead because the title was ugly or did not match another company's. If more sources are needed to support the full name, those can be provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brenda haines (talk • contribs) 19:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Garrett Wilson (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Garrett Wilson (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)