Beidelberg

Welcome!

Hello, Beidelberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Boaz Eidelberg, Ph.D., may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• How to write a great article
• The perfect article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 17:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Boaz Eidelberg, Ph.D.

The article Boaz Eidelberg, Ph.D. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or WP:NPROF.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 17:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Boaz Eidelberg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boaz Eidelberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boaz Eidelberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 05:23, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Just a note, given your COI, you really need to refrain from creating articles directly in mainspace or editing directly in mainspace in areas where you have a WP:COI and instead should go through WP:AFC or request edits on the talk page. Praxidicae (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. The reason I got into it was to recognize Anwar Chitayat incredible contribution to technology. It has been 30 years so it may take us some time to collect it all. I am aware of the COI, but doubt if anyone can create a reliable, unbiased, credible information. This is a technological business development notability which takes some expertise to navigate through it. Since I must have Anwar's approval to allmy input to his page I decided to try creating my own page. I did it yesterday in 1 day to get familiar with the Wikipedia process. While writing and getting your feedback I realized that there are several related subjects missing in Wikipedia, on which I have no COI issues, and should write about. I hope that the automation technology folks will find useful.

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anwar Chitayat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bagdad and Industry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boaz Eidelberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Thanks will change to Principal head teacher Beidelberg (talk) 12:47, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boaz Eidelberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Legacy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited High performance positioning system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gantry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anwar Chitayat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hauppauge.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)