Bell MT

Welcome!

Hello, Bell MT, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as New Theories on the birth of the universe (book), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

T I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of New Theories on the birth of the universe (book)

The article New Theories on the birth of the universe (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK. Author does not appear to be notable either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (New Theories on the birth of the universe (book)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating New Theories on the birth of the universe (book), Bell MT!

Wikipedia editor Jersey92 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Speedy deletion nomination of New Theories on the birth of the universe (book)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Theories on the birth of the universe (book), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Jersey92 (talk) 02:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Jersey92's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Monroe County Public Library has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

TeamViewer June 2016 outage

Hey Bell MT - your quick warning at the top of the TeamViewer article, although incorrectly used in an encyclopedia, seems like it was probably issued in good faith.

However, one good reason to always avoid this type of edit: it could not be backed up by verifiable sources. Without an impartial source, such a bold statement cannot stand on its own in any encyclopedia, no matter how well-intentioned or imperative. --dstone66^{(ṭạḷḳ)} 23:36, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Big Tuna— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 00:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)