Belsmore23, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Belsmore23! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

edit

Unspecified source/license for File:He-is-legend-few.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:He-is-legend-few.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

April 2017

edit

Please stop readding reviews from Currently Streaming. They were removed on a number of album articles, and you're continuing to restore them as if you are promoting them. This is coming off as if you work for that site, as it's all you've done since you registered to Wikipedia. Please read WP:COI for why this is a problem, and also check out WP:QUESTIONABLE. Currently Streaming does not have a Wikipedia article and is not considered notable for that reason or even particularly reliable, because it's a site that basically nobody knows. Its social media accounts and the lack of information about it in other sources make it look like it is an amateur outlet, and you claiming in summaries that it's "reputable" with no proof to back up your claim is not going to change anyone's mind. Ss112 01:54, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply