Bernettmanagement

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:36, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Photo

Hi there

I have reverted the article on Amanda Shires to the version with the old photo. I feel that the new photo you added, whilst clearly a nice image, reduced the encyclopedic nature of the article significantly given that Amanda's face is completely obscured.

All the best, ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:05, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

We (Amanda personally and her team) are trying to update her page and you keep deleting our picture change. Please stop changing it, as it's coming directly from Amanda herself.

Thank you. We do appreciate your contributions.

All the best, user: Bernettmanagement

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Amanda Shires may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:48, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Username

Your username is in violation of Wikipedia's username policy because it implies shared use of the account, especially in connection with edits such as this one. Wikipedia accounts are for individuals, not for groups or organizations. You should probably abandon this account and create new accounts for the editing individuals; otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

You may also want to read Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. As the editor reverting you said in their edit summaries, an image where Shires is completely obscured is less useful than one showing what she looks like, and Shires' own wishes cannot supersede the usefulness to the encyclopedia. Huon (talk) 21:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)