BertBril
November 2011
editWelcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Scrum (development), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Please add references and don't make grand, rambling commentary. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:38, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
There has to be a section like this one. We have to start somewhere. There is no reference there because that's exactly what I'm trying to add: the lack of proof. So I would expect you to either improve the text, or have it in. It is almost impossible to disagree about the topics I'm raising; only your opinion may be different. So step up, or accept. Doing otherwise would seem like pre-occupied action with a hidden agenda. BertBril (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to add to that: I'm a bit curious why you left out the 'positive' parts that I wrote. I think we all agree that SCRUM can be useful, for one. The problem with the page as it was before was: it was like text straight from a commercial white paper! That is not a good idea. I can hardly figure out where I saw what on god knows what sites I've visited. Hopefully others can step up and add citations: I can't remember to save my life. But do you disagree that a section like this is badly needed? I can see others having teh same opinion. Let's start now. BertBril (talk) 22:17, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
- I responded on the article's talk page. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2011 (UTC)