This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bertaut. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As an editor previously involved in the SAQ mediation, you should note that there is a related Request for Arbitration [1], at which you may wish to participate. Smatprt (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Titus authorship page
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi,
Just wanted to say - brilliant work on Titus Andronicus and the other Shakespeare articles you've worked on. I know some of them may be too detailed for Wiki's mandate, but I've found them fascinating. I really struggle to find such detailed discussions of individual plays on the web. (Would that Love's Labour's Lost had been so well treated!) I do hope you'll do more in future, and that - should they be subsequently pared down - you could preserve them on the 'net nonetheless. Cheers, Daydream believer2 (talk) 11:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks very much. Very much appreciated that you would take the time to say that. Yeah, I'm more than aware that they're too detailed/too long; what I post is usually a third draft, you should see the size of the first!! As for Love's Labour's, well, I'm doing the plays in chronological order as per the Oxford Complete Works, which means Richard III is up next. So it'll be a while before I get to Love's I'm afraid! But maybe some day. Who knows!! And thanks again for you kind words. Seriously, I do appreciate it. Bertaut (talk) 23:39, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bertaut. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
