Bewakoofian

September 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chiranjeevi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chiranjeevi was changed by Bewakoofian (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969823 on 2014-09-14T05:02:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Aagadu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 21:42, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Aagadu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• http://www.indiaglitz.com/Aagadu-telugu-movie-review-18066|title=Aagadu Review (Telugu) |publisher=[[India Glitz]|date=19 September, 2014|accessdate=25 August 2014}}</ref> Now running gave the film 2.
• http://www.indiaglitz.com/Aagadu-telugu-movie-review-18066|title=Aagadu Review (Telugu) |publisher=[[India Glitz]|date=19 September, 2014|accessdate=25 August 2014}}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:45, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rakshana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teja. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Aagadu reply

I did not do anything wrong. In fact you are making disruptive edits on Aagadu. You removed teaser controversy, you deconstructed everything, you made the page a mess completely and now you are firing on me. Did i said that i am a Mahesh's fan. I edited this article like all other ones. You have problems with my work and i don't give a damn about it. When source says decent, i wrote it and you reverted it and called my act as a fan's act. Now i cant edit Aagadu and go, make merry. If not, do whatever you want.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:55, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Mahesh vs Pawan rivalry is something which is a favorite thing for test edits. What you said about the collections happens for many of the articles. I cant comment whether people can watch such films or not as that is not something good to do here. But one thing is sure that they watch such films mostly. I am ending my message here itself because i neither have words nor intention to comment more than this. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:13, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bewakoofian reported by User:Dusti (Result: ). Thank you. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 12:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kshana kshanam.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kshana kshanam.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 01:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Kailash29792 (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)