Welcome

edit
Hello, Bhawnagusain174, and Welcome to Wikipedia!    

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Bhawnagusain174, good luck, and have fun. North America1000 09:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much.. It will be my pleasure to share my knowledge with community. Thank you once again Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 09:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. An edit that you recently made to Portal:Global warming seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! North America1000 09:17, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Portal:India, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. North America1000 10:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Praxidicae (talk) 10:14, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Okay I will remember this thing. Thank you for your help. I am new here so I don't know much about it. Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 10:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Room (novel) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:45, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dramatic structure. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dramatic structure was changed by Bhawnagusain174 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88649 on 2020-07-14T10:40:53+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:40, 14 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your article

edit

Hello Bhawnagusain, I've moved your article back to User:Bhawnagusain174/sandbox. It is currently not written as an encyclopedic article and it includes claims that go against our standards of only reflecting high quality medical sources. I would not recommend working on an article with this particular scope because the topic is for a blog-style essay rather than being a subject fit for an encyclopedia. If you have any questions about editing, come ask at the TeahouseThjarkur (talk) 13:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

I've reverted your addition of sources to Universal Health Services because the sources you added don't verify the contents of the text. Adding a source that doesn't verify the content is detrimental to the article.

I also reverted your sources at Magic: The Gathering (1997 video game) because they were unreliable.

Thjarkur (talk) 13:44, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Could you assist me in reverting your additions of sources which don't verify the content they're attached to? – Thjarkur (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can see them in your contribution history Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I know I can, but I've had to personally go through all your contributions and revert all but two of them. Usually people clean up after themselves when problems are pointed out. – Thjarkur (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You should. Please think before doing anything. You guys are qualified doesn't mean you can do anything with other people's posts. Do you know how much time I spent on those. You didn't take a minute saying that my citations are not qualified According to you. After doing any edit I always check my contribution that I did right thing or not. Do you Know when you guys do something like this you demoralize others who are new at Wikipedia. I also don't know about them and not currently on my PC. So I will do them myself Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You should understand that people who are new here how much time they are spending and doing hard work in editing posts. Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bhawna, I did carefully go through the sources you provided and reverted those that did not back up the content they were attached to. Wikipedia, being so open, does make it very easy for one to do things incorrectly without anyone noticing it to correct you, and everybody makes a handful of mistakes when starting out here, it's the only way one learns how Wikipedia works. But just so it's clear what I was referring to: Citations are not just links to website about the things mentioned in the sentence, instead they need to contain material with which one can verify that the preceding sentence/paragraph is true/verifiable. – Thjarkur (talk) 16:58, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can see by yourself if they were not important or wrong Wikipedia didn't give me points and never give you -ve points if they were wrong. Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 17:00, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

If you think they are wrong so why are you reverting them. let them stay as they are Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 17:01, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Thazh Thiravaa

edit

Hi! Can you improve and move to main article. Eswnav (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Move what?

Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Thazh Thiravaa improve and move. Eswnav (talk) 14:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is the movie. Eswnav (talk) 14:29, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Okay.But you can do yourself this why me? Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't know Eswnav (talk) 14:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello please improve and move this article. Eswnav (talk) 14:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can do this so why me? are you gonna pay me for this? Bhawnagusain174 (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please Eswnav (talk) 14:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is the movie please expand and move to main page. Please Eswnav (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Eswnav: Stop influencing the edits of others!TamilMirchi (talk) 21:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bhawnagusain174/sandbox

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Bhawnagusain174/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 15:05, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
  Hello, Bhawnagusain174. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 08:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply