June 2020

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yes and no. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 09:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)   Hello, I'm Visioncurve. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Yes and no have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. VisioncurveTimendi causa est nescire 09:46, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Big-small-giant-PP/sandbox

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Big-small-giant-PP/sandbox. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ~~ Alex Noble/1-2/TRB 09:52, 25 June 2020 (UTC)Reply