BigFrank100

Welcome to the Military history WikiProject!

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, peer review, and project-wide collaboration.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• Our requests page has extensive lists of requested articles, images, maps, and translations.
• We've developed a variety of guidelines for article structure and content, template use, categorization, and other issues that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Kirill Lokshin 05:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Hey he has been He has been harassing me and Tony360X. Give him a warning -BigFrank100

It's a perfectly valid sock suspicion page. You can refute his claim without resorting to personal attacks. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

He will not droup the issue and he has no real strong evidence against me. Only that I supported Tony360X version of the article. I find that a personal attack aginst my credablity. - -BigFrank100

Plea for Un-blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that user pbryan has been harassing me and I wish for it to end now. I do not wish for to be ban but an administrator who hears my plea to ask him kindly to end this grudge or feud he has against me. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

You appear to be a confirmed sockpuppet, as per Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony360X. -- Yamla 21:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Pardon me Yamla but did you even read my reason to be unblocked or did you just look at reason as to why I was blocked. I feel it is always best to hear both sides of a story before coming with a reasonable answer. I ask you please to reconsider this and listen to my plea. Thank You – BigFrank100, Feb 21 2007

I thought Betacommand's analysis had established a strong confirmation of sockpuppetry. May I suggest that if you truly are not a sockpuppet of Tony360X, then perhaps you could request a Wikipedia:Checkuser to help clear your name. pbryan 23:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm having trouble with it. Can you show me how to put in a request. - User:BigFrank100

I don't think you can directly ask for one (being currently blocked), but you could add a request for checkuser as a part of an unblock request, or you could also add a checkuser request anonymously and plea your case to Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser. pbryan 22:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Unfortuantely, I don't think they'll do it. See the header on top of WP:RFCU, namely:

• Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence"
• These requests are not performed. Please do not ask.

I'm not sure enough about the situation to deny or accept an unblock request. The last resort is the unblock-en-l mailing list. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 22:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Second Plea

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Fist of I wish some one new to take up my case. I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that the evidence used aginst me was flawed and that during my time with Wikipedia I have contributed a good deal to different articles and helped out a lot. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I'm convinced you are the same user as Tony360X. If this really isn't true, it's probably better for you to just create a new account for yourself and give up on this one. Mangojuice^talk 14:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Check User

BigFrank100 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Third Plea for Un-Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigFrank100 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all I wish for some one new to take up my case. I was blocked un-justly because pbryan had accused me of being a sock puppet. The story behind this that on February 11 2007 I was accused of being a Sock puppet for user Tony360X, his evidence was that we supported a certain issue and that we have had spelling errors. Ten days passed with no action and according to Wikipedia policy I could remove the banner that claimed I was a sock puppet and all charges brought up on me would be dropped. Now today on February 21 I am banned because Pomte brings up some last minute accusations against me and Tony360X. This reason I have been banned with out a certain limited placed on me. So I requested to be unblocked for I am not a sock puppet of Tony360X and that the evidence used aginst me was flawed and that during my time with Wikipedia I have contributed a good deal to different articles and helped out a lot. I also request a check user to prove my innocence. To who ever is reading this I would like to thank you for a moment of your time.

Decline reason:

This is exactly the same reason you gave when I denied your unblock request. No RFCU can be filed in this case, as this just isn't one of the situations where a Checkuser request is appropriate: see WP:RFCU. Take my advice and just start over. Mangojuice^talk 04:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

First off I wanted a new guy to reviwe me and not another bias lacky of pbryan. Second why sould I make a new profile? So Mr.pbryan could acuess me of being a puppet again. I think not. I want justice. I will do anything to prove my innocence. - BigFrank100

I don't know what constitutes justice in your view, but you can be reasonably assured that: a) I won't accuse anyone of being a sockpuppet without reasonable cause, and b) should you be accused again, nobody will block you without independently reviewing the evidence presented. pbryan 21:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

I constitutes justice as being a) un-blocked and b) left alone so I could share my knowldge with people on wikipedia. - BigFrank100

You know what I took Mango advice and made a new page since this page has been ruind. So all I have to say is leave me be. - BigFrank101

What is this bull crap

Now some dick decides to vandlise my page by erasing every thing. What the f*** is going on here. I want justice, I want justice- BigFrank100

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XII - February 2007

The February 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:43, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIII - March 2007

The March 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 18:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV (April 2007)

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:34, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XV (May 2007)

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:26, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI (June 2007)

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 13:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVIII, December 2010

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 21:56, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:32, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 21:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.