Speedy deletion of James Richard Hollingsworth

edit
 

A tag has been placed on James Richard Hollingsworth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 19:10, 30 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of The King Louis

edit
 

A tag has been placed on The King Louis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Chris (complaints)(contribs) 00:04, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Category:',end:'

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:',end:', by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:',end:' is a test page.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:',end:', please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:30, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of "Master of beats, y'all"

edit
 

A page you created, Master of beats, y'all, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it redirects from an implausible misspelling.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. Blanchardb-MeMyEarsMyMouth-timed 02:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of reliable sources.]]

edit
 

The article reliable sources.]] has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable nightclub lacking significant coverage in independent [{WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on Talk:reliable sources.|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 17:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Jeef berky listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jeef berky. Since you had some involvement with the Jeef berky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:42, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Deaner listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deaner. Since you had some involvement with the Deaner redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:39, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

  User:BigUns/Theonewhereiintroducemyselfandgiveinformationonthewellbeingoftheearthandthepeoplewhoinhabitit Wowthisisalongtitle, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BigUns/Theonewhereiintroducemyselfandgiveinformationonthewellbeingoftheearthandthepeoplewhoinhabitit Wowthisisalongtitle and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:BigUns/Theonewhereiintroducemyselfandgiveinformationonthewellbeingoftheearthandthepeoplewhoinhabitit Wowthisisalongtitle during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)Reply