Bigbruce354
Joined 30 October 2012
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Redrose64 in topic Models
|
Models
editHi, I see that you've added sections on models to several articles - I've had to fix them up, because you put the source so that it appeared in the text; in each case, I enclosed your ref in <ref>...</ref>
tags, like this; and sometimes needed to add a references section containing a {{reflist}}
as well. In one case I needed to move your new section up a bit, to stay clear of the standard appendices. See WP:CITEBEGIN to find out more. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi
- You commented on my editing and if I did it wrong I apologise, I copied from another page. However, your amendments just seem to confuse the issue. I don't see the need for a reference. Just need a link from Silver Fox Models to the page on the website. Just want to keep it as simple as possible.
- Regards
- BigBruce354
- --Bigbruce354 (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've moved your reply here so that we can keep it all in one place
- OK, it's possible that the page that you copied from was itself laid out incorrectly - which page was it?
- There is a general need for references on Wikipedia, since we have a policy on verifiability; but it is preferred to use a third-party source, such as a review in a reputable modelling magazine like Railway Modeller or British Railway Modelling. Links to a manufacturer's website aren't third-party, so if they are not being used as a reference, they must satisfy the guideline on external links. In particular, see WP:ELPOINTS and MOS:APPENDIX regarding placement; and WP:ELNO regarding the types of links that are prohibited (such as item 5 "links to individual web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services"). So, if you could find some magazine reviews, that'd be great.
- I won't be online this afternoon, since I shall be at the meetup in Reading. You're welcome to come along if you like . --Redrose64 (talk) 09:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)