This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigwill91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

False positive. I was calm since I was editing anonymously. But now I can edit constructively. However, my account isn't a sock puppet. Usually, I wasn't disrupting Wikipedia at all. So, I am here to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. Bigwill91 (talk) 00:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigwill91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was actually refraining from disrupting Wikipedia for more than 6 months while editing anonymously. So, usually, William Pina is my former account, and I wasn't using it anymore since it was locked. Besides, I was starting to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but my account was unsuitable. I didn't do nothing wrong. Well, I think this was a mistake. Bigwill91 (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You are not welcome to edit here, with an account or anonymously, until you clear up the block on your original account. The block was issued against you, the person behind the account. Frankly speaking, this is the sort of WP:CIR issue that lead to your block. Kuru (talk) 01:44, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

But my original account is globally locked. What else should I do? Bigwill91 (talk) 01:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)Reply
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bigwill91 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is just my new account. It is not a sock puppet. My previous account was William Pina (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log). So, I can make helpful edits now. Bigwill91 (talk) 3:09 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Your accont is not globally locked. As multiple users have now told you, in order to be unblocked, you need to make a request via UTRS under your original username (I see that you have already made one such request, which was declined). I am removing your access to this talkpage, since this account is not going to be unblocked, and I would urge you to read the appeals guide very carefully before emailing UTRS again. Yunshui  08:29, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.