BillyFromPeru
Why
editDear god... WHY would you nominate it for deletion.... Jeancey (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Muammar Gaddafi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
i do not understand BillyFromPeru (talk) 21:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever you think of Gaddafi he was notable and this is an encyclopedia not a book of moral judgements. As such the article meets the criteria for inclusion. Please do not make any more deletion nominations based on good or bad. NtheP (talk) 21:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
October 2011
editPlease do not create bad-faith AFD nominations, or vote in your own nominations. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:36, 30 October 2011 (UTC) i did not know i could not vote thank you sory
Welcome
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion}}|your recent AFD nominations]] do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on deletion. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please do so in the "sandbox".
If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.
I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! WikiPuppies! (bark) 21:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Muammar Gaddafi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Please Stop
editThe Muammar Gaddafi article is NOT going to be deleted, please stop nominating it. Jeancey (talk) 21:47, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- if he does not deleted their is no justise on wikipedia this is badBillyFromPeru (talk) 21:48, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
- Wikipedia doesn't delete article for people who are bad. He is notable, so he needs an article. Whether he is good or bad has nothing to do with it. In fact, bad people are more likely to actually have an article. Jeancey (talk) 21:50, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Muammar Gaddafi, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 21:58, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muammar Gaddafi, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Theroadislong (talk) 21:59, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|your reason here}} below. Wknight94 talk 22:01, 30 October 2011 (UTC) 
BillyFromPeru (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
wikipedia needs to stop sensoring myy beliefs i can do wat i want
Decline reason:
No, you can't. --Kinu t/c 22:28, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.