Binit00gogoi

Vandalism

Hello, can I ask what of my edit on Assam constituted vandalism? I can put the hyperlinks back in and keep the wording if that’s the matter. Gherkinmad (talk) 19:13, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

There was some spelling errors which you had done. The recent edit is fine.Binit00gogoi (talk)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binit00gogoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked without any proper reason cited. Binit00gogoi (talk) 23:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL^{Query me!} 01:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Binit00gogoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #20474 was submitted on Jan 30, 2018 00:07:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Binit00gogoi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked stating sock puppetry without citing any proof by an admin. The admin might have mistook me with someone else or maybe a shared IP. I have made all proper edits without violating any terms. Kindly unblock me. Binit00gogoi (talk) 04:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

 Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 18:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.