BioImages2000

May 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Entity-attribute-value model worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 21:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Teliospore

The line that you deleted in Teliospore

deleted meaningless last line "They also have a thick-capped telia as compared to urediniospores

probably meant that the thick cap helped to distinguish between the two types of spores. If so, then it was a hlpful sentence albeit poorly phrased. I am not knowledgeable enough about the detailed anatomy or rusts to know for certain the right answer, but perhaps you would be kind enough to re-visit it. Thanks  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   10:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the update at Teliospore. You also added some see also links including one to Aeciospore which re-directs to Ascospore - straight from Basidiomycetes to Ascomycetes in one deft leap! It would be great if you fix that too. Many thanks  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   18:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Aeciospore, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 19:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Please see the message above. BioImages2000 was , no doubt, responding to my request. Redirecting Aeciospore to Ascopore is akin to re-directing Elephant to Elephant Shrew - not the same thing at all.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   20:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Absolutely! But apologies for omitting to add an explanation. BioImages2000 (talk) 08:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Camsal

The article Camsal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)