User talk:Biohistorian15/Archive 3

< Archive 2

Archive 3

All Pages:

1 -  2 -  3 -  ... (up to 100)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Progress Studies (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Progress Studies and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Manuel Custódia has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manuel Custódia. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 14:34, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Interesting stuff

Please read this. Ewan Birney, Jennifer Raff, Adam Rutherford and Aylwyn Scally wrote it. Polygnotus (talk) 06:10, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello @Polygnotus. Thanks for the recommendation, interesting read. I have to say that I do not trust anybody in this debate, none of the camps; there are simply too many political implications to every single aspect of these constructs. And I believe a serious measure of care must be applied when using quick and easy political labels to describe any of these, their publications or concepts. That's all. Biohistorian15 (talk) 10:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

On an unrelated note, Polygnotus, you have the coolest talk page customization I've ever seen. Biohistorian15 (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! I stole it from User:Frostly (of The Signpost). Polygnotus (talk) 20:40, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Gyat on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Good bot, I'm always up for commenting on some gyatts. Biohistorian15 (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Schlatt (September 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Schlatt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 22:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Biohistorian15! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liancetalk 22:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)

Revert on genocide article

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

If I'm going to improve an article, it happens in mainspace so that readers can benefit right away instead of needing to merge in a sandboxed version later. There is no requirement to use a sandbox. All wikipedia articles are a work in progress and thus no excuse for a blanket revert that doesn't address the problems I identified with your edit. (t · c) buidhe 14:43, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

@buidhe, we both know that I was not edit warring.

You have absolutely been making great contributions to this article over the years, but are now demonstrating some very clear WP:OWNERSHIP behavior. Biohistorian15 (talk) 14:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

If you're going to re-revert, You need to address why the revert rationale is wrong (like I did in my edit) and preferably use the talk page where we are already discussing the images. You can edit war without going over 3RR. (t · c) buidhe 14:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

I guess so. One additional flaw with your rationale was that I have, in fact, moved the image(s) to a section they more accurately belong to.

Seriously though, buidhe, the article has 7000+ edits, there is no special protection for "works in progress." Biohistorian15 (talk) 14:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

• In this edit the source is speaking generally about settler colonialism but you put in a link that for a specific theory about the United States. This illustrates the problem of trying to edit an article without looking at the sources. (t · c) buidhe 15:19, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

  Context: it was a redlink and the phrase "closing of the frontier" is basically never used outside of US history. Biohistorian15 (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

  It is in the cited source. Redlinks are not bad. (t · c) buidhe 15:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

  Ok, revert it. Biohistorian15 (talk) 15:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

  Never mind, I'll self-rv, sorry. Biohistorian15 (talk) 15:40, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ideology and Utopia has been accepted

Ideology and Utopia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 00:19, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Herrera (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandon Herrera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Truth and Method, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Fixed. Biohistorian15 (talk) 19:56, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brandon Herrera (September 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brandon Herrera and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 20:26, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

ANI notice about frivolous SPIs

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 90.255.65.51 (talk) 21:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:French Communist Party on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 19 September 2024 (UTC)