Biosaber

January 2011

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.--Eaglestorm (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of best-selling video game franchises, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ ^(talk) 19:43, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Some advice Biosaber: Please take a good look at the guide lines before editing. Your edits leave something to be desired I'm afraid. --Soetermans. T / C 12:14, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing.

Again, could you please look at the guide lines? So far, your edits mainly concern removing the word "fictional" from articles or adding misleading words like "popular". If you won't change your attitude, you might get blocked. Thanks. --Soetermans. T / C 09:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

And this is downright annoying. --Soetermans. T / C 09:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of best-selling video game franchises. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Alphathon /'æl.f'æ.ðɒn/ ^(talk) 12:41, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. Don't be a jerk If you don't want to get blocked, change your attitude. And you could leave a reply, you know. --Soetermans. T / C 10:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello!

hallo Biosaber. I noticed the vast majority of your edits seem to be getting reverted, these reverts are usually for a very good reason. You should really listen to the reasons people are giving you. If you feel these edits should be made you should discuss the issue on the respective article's talk page - rather than reinstating the text without any explanation. This will help us to help you. Cheers. Rehevkor ✉ 18:30, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi again. Due to your unfortunate lack of communication I have reported your actions to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Problematic user. Please come and discuss the issue there. Rehevkor ✉ 16:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

If issues are raised with your editing, it is in your best interests to enter into discussion. Editors who failed to enter into discussion in the past have been blocked for this. I'm not saying that you editing is not in good faith, but you do need to start talking to other editors. Mjroots (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Apologies for the late reply, but all I can do is to repeat the earlier advice. If you are getting reverted, then discuss it with the editors who are reverting you, either on their or the article's talk page. Mjroots (talk) 09:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)