User talk:BishopTakesQueen/sandbox

Feedback on article contribution

These comments are in no particular order:

• This experience definitely feels like deja vu, so I think I probably did comment once, even though I must not have saved.
• What photo of Elizabeth do you plan to use?
• The contribution at present is a bit shy of a paragraph which was the goal.
• I know we talked about breaking the article into sections, but I don't remember precisely how that reorganization was going to play out, so I'm not entirely clear what "similar problem" your proposed contribution will follow. I'm assuming your add comes after the discussion of women in academia.
• The phenomenon you describe for women in the military sounds like a classic "double bind," in which women must be masculine to succeed and are often simultaneously critiqued for not being feminine. If that's what's being described, "double bind" has a page on Wikipedia that you could link to.
• For expansion, certainly additional examples would be relevant. It would also be possible to find scholarly conversations of the personal cost of honorary male (aka the phenomenon of the double bind.)--Jagrif02 (talk) 17:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)