Welcome

edit
Hello Hoodiefanboy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Hoodiefanboy, good luck, and have fun.Aboutmovies (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hoodie Allen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • making music with RJ Ferguson (aka RJF), giving himself the name Hoodie Allen.<ref name=tgl>[http://www.thagoodlifereviews.com/2010/10/13/hoodie-allen-interview/ TGLR Interview with Hoodie

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rubik's cube

edit

I reverted you because you made a mess of restoring the edits you had reverted. If you just have a problem with the award why don't you just delete that line and say why in the edit summary? Undoing stuff that was done months ago and mixed up with all sorts of other issues is bound to make a mess. SpinningSpark 23:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoodie Allen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riff Raff. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Monitor article

edit

Hello, thank you for writing this article! I’m a bit concerned that this zine might not be notable enough to qualify for a Wikipedia article. That link goes to a guide, but basically any coverage of a newspaper or publication on here is supposed to be based on being covered in reliable sources, like books and newspapers. (Those are links to guides explaining this in more detail.)

Are there any extra citations you can add demonstrating that it's notable? I'm concerned since the article may get deleted otherwise. Let me know if you have any thoughts or questions about this. Blythwood (talk) 13:38, 19 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Adam Rapoport

edit

Hello Bl4kers,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Adam Rapoport for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crushed Red (November 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 15:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bl4kers! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! QuantumRealm (meowpawtrack) 15:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crushed Red (December 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 16:38, 20 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crushed Red (January 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 21:09, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Crushed Red has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Crushed Red. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crushed Red (May 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Stuartyeates (talk) 09:13, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Crushed Red

edit

  Hello, Bl4kers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crushed Red, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

CMA New Artist of the Year

edit

The Chicks were still known as the Dixie Chicks when they won the then-Horizon Award at the CMAs in 1998; they did not drop “Dixie” from their name until 2020. So for chronological reasons, “Dixie Chicks” is the name we have to go by. Zredman (talk) 16:25, 10 April 2024 (UTC)Reply