Blackeyedfool12

Hi I am Blackeyedfool12.

Here is a really cool article here![1]

Ok, I have blanked this page which should stop all the mistaken stuff. Please just let me know if you have any further problems. And please don't insult anyone. You have accidentally wound up flagging the anti-vandalism application, which is why everyone is showing up here (and reverting your edits to the sandbox in my case). Prodego ^talk 03:29, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Blackeyedfool12, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --otherl left^{No, really, other way . . .} 03:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

FYI

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Should you come back and read this, I really want to apologize for your experience tonight. Many many things went wrong here, I and I am very sorry for what happened. Everyone involved here was was at fault in some way, myself included. I sincerely hope that this does forever tarnish opinion of the Wikipedia community, though it is understandable that it could. Please, if you need any assistance, or have any questions, leave a note on my talk page, or email me at Prodego@gmail.com. If there is anything I can do to help you 'start over' I would be glad to do it. Prodego ^talk 04:59, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

November 2008

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Wikipedia: Sandbox worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. Eclectic hippie ^{talk to me} 15:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sandbox

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I wanted to thank you for using the sandbox for your experiments on Wikipedia. However, because the sandbox is designed to be experimented with by any user, frequently your changes will only last seconds, so please don't get offended that that stuff you put in there disappears quickly.

As you have discovered, sometimes editors using automated tools to fight vandalism will unintentionally warn you for editing the sandbox. Mistakes happen on Wikipedia, and we all try to assume the best intentions of other editors; I hope you will do the same.

A couple rules that absolutely does apply to the sandbox and all Wikipedia pages is a requirement for being polite to one another, and not attacking people. If you get warnings for calling someone a "fruit" in the sandbox, it's a legitimate warning that should be taken seriously. You may not think it's "serious enough," but if someone else does, please be more careful.

I'd be happy to work with you to learn more about Wikipedia, because it can be a ridiculously complicated place. Feel free to either reply here or use my talk page.--otherl left^{No, really, other way . . .} 15:51, 28 November 2008 (UTC) Calling someone a fruit is not a personal attack nor is it offensive. Calling someone a jackass for example is. The sandbox is not being used for personal attacks anywayReply

Blackeyedfool12

My comments about the block

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I did not make any personal attacks. Let's get it right a fruit is not a personal attack. And Jeff G. was the one who started this feud and kept harassing me so unblock me please or at least block him too

If you want to ask for the block to be overturned, type {{unblock|your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. I would advise that you wait it out, though, and try to cool down. As I said, this place is way more complicated than it looks, and I think you've gotten very frustrated and now you're making some bad decisions. As I said, if you want to make good contributions I can help you out when you're back.--otherl left^{No, really, other way . . .} 16:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

12 hour block

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. PhilKnight (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blackeyedfool12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not make any personal attacks. Let's get it right a fruit is not a personal attack. And Jeff G. was the one who started this feud and kept harassing me so unblock me please or at least block him too

Decline reason:

I disagree. I doubt if you'd take kindly to being called a fruit or a motherfucker. You've had adequate warnings. In the circumstances, I regard twelve hours as remarkably lenient. Rodhull andemu 16:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Evidence for the block

That second one is only my business but I will accept being blocked for the first one, Jeff G. harassed me left and right and started this silly fight so please block him as well.

If I get called a fruit, I honsetly don't care. And everybody else would not care either. Heck, a fruit is not even an insult. I honestly don't mind being reffered to as as motherfucker. It's not that bad. And anyway, I will accept my block but I truly believe that Jeff G. should be blocked too for harassment and starting that silly fight.

Oh and Jeff G., you lost the fight because you were harassing me, getting blocked does not mean losing the fight.

Blackeyedfool12

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Blackeyedfool12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will accept being blocked but you should block Jeff G. too for him harssing me.

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblocking provided. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:35, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to other admins

Feel free to unblock, or change the block duration, without contacting me. PhilKnight (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic