Welcome!

Hello, Blackgateamericanindian! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!   — Jess· Δ 00:25, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

March 2015

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Kent Hovind shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.   — Jess· Δ 01:15, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Alternative Views

edit

Category:Alternative Views, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Student7 (talk) 19:54, 15 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I think you probably meant for that to be created in the article space, rather than as a category. In case that gets deleted, I don't want you to lose your work so here is your original text: RevelationDirect (talk) 00:09, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Some historians such as Dr. David Plaisted have contended that the Inquisiton could have exceeded millions of executions, citing many protestant historians as sources.[1] Modern scholars dispute these claims, however, claiming that the 50,000,000 number is simply impossible considering the low population rate and the time and resources needed in order to both charge and execute that many within such a low time period[2] Nevertheless it remains a contentious topic within protestant circles.

Yes, I did indeed. Thanks for the tip. I was really new to Wikipedia when I made that edit.Blackgateamericanindian (talk) 00:15, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
I moved the page to User:Blackgateamericanindian/sandbox. – Fayenatic London 10:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)Reply