Welcome!

edit

Hello, Blackrosie vn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Áo dài into Vietnamese clothing. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 23:48, 6 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Uncited additions to Regional forms of shamanism

edit

Hi, you added some interesting materials to this article, but omitted to provide a reliable source for them. Could you please do so now: this is basically essential for every claim you make in any Wikipedia article. See WP:V for why, WP:RS for what counts as reliable, and WP:REFB for how to get started. Many thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Xin chào, bạn đã thêm một số tài liệu thú vị vào bài viết này, nhưng đã bỏ qua để cung cấp một nguồn đáng tin cậy cho chúng. Bạn có thể vui lòng làm như vậy ngay bây giờ: điều này về cơ bản là cần thiết cho mọi khiếu nại bạn đưa ra trong bất kỳ bài viết Wikipedia nào. Xem WP:V để biết tại sao, WP:RS để biết mức độ đáng tin cậy và WP:REFB để biết cách bắt đầu. Cảm ơn nhiều, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:03, 8 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, despite the above friendly note, you have ignored the warning and have created an almost-uncited article later today at Khăn vấn. This is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Please get into the habit of citing everything: it's important as anything uncited can be DELETED by ANY EDITOR at any time, and poorly-cited articles are likely to be deleted completely from the encyclopedia as not notable (because there is no evidence that the topic is significant in books or journals). It is therefore critically important that you provide suitable citations. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:45, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply