Introduction to contentious topics

edit

You have recently edited a page related to governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

SWATJester Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat! 21:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, given that no one has made any response to my topic "Relevance of these two opinions" on the same page, would it be appropriate for me to delete the content I posted about from the page? After reading through WP:ROC, I think it is appropriate to remove them from the page because I am not aware of these two individuals possessing any kind of significant influence on the broader perception of the Heller decision (As opposed to someone like the NRA's Wayne LaPierre or a particularly prominent gun control advocate like the late Senator Feinstein). If there are any policies, guidelines, or procedures I would be in violation of in doing so please let me know as I was unable to find them. (If I don't here back from you by tomorrow I'm going to go ahead and do it). Thanks, Blast335 (talk) 13:16, 15 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
B335, you can WP:PING editors if you want to make sure they see something. Valereee (talk) 20:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Contentious topic alert

edit

  You have recently made edits related to abortion. This is a standard message to inform you that abortion is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Valereee (talk) 20:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hi Blast335! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Valereee (talk) 20:35, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply