Blether
August 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia. The project's content policies require that all articles be written from a neutral point of view, and not introduce bias or give undue weight to viewpoints. Please bear this in mind when making edits such as your recent edit to Ivanhoe. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 16:07, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:06, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Welcome
editHey Blether! Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions. My name is Tommy and have been editing Wikipedia for a while now and would like to personally welcome you to the place!
First things first: be bold- Big or small, help out in any way you can!
To help you get going, you should see some of the links below:
- Check out what we are all about
- Tutorial for editing pages
- All about editing Wikipedia
- Using the page history fuction at the top of the page.
Important guidelines to follow as you contribute:
- Remember to write in a neutral point of view
- Assume that most people who edit Wikipedia are trying to help
- Please verify any facts or statistics you add to articles and do not use your own experiences, unless you can reliably cite it
- Use caution while editing articles about living people
- Lastly, use the manual of style for formatting articles
If at anytime you need help, you can just edit this page with {{helpme}} below. Alternatively, you can search Help:Contents or ask me directly on my talk page. Again, Welcome!
I want to apologize if I was rude to you before. Your edits are good, just a bit biased. I was having a bad day. Tommy! [message] 04:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Could you please explain your reversion[1] of User:Wcoole's edit deleting a seeming non-sequitur about Connecticut Yankee? In the absence of any additional context, I share Wcoole's opinion that the sentence doesn't appear to belong in that place. If some discussion of Twain's relationship to this topic is desirable, another approach was suggested by the comment on the talk page proposing a criticism section, starting with Twain as a leading critic of Ivanhoe. Best,--Arxiloxos (talk) 18:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
The reference to Connecticut Yankee emphasises the point that the "anachronism" is quite intentional and considered - particularly for an encyclopedia whose readership is still more American than anything else. An extensive "Mark Twain as critic" is beyond my expertise. I agree that such a section would add to the topic. I believe that this brief reference does too. Blether (talk) 20:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:59, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Emma Brockes and Criticism of Noam Chomsky
edit Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wikispan (talk) 12:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
August 2015
edit Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chloral hydrate, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Plantsurfer 19:48, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, Blether. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Blether. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Recent BLP discussion
editHi - don't worry, that discussion did not concern you or any of your edits. The other editor pinged you in error in this edit - I think they must have misread my signature, and confused the link to my talk page with my username. Anyway, you shouldn't have been notified, I have no concerns about any of your editing - sorry you were inconvenienced. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 09:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
edit| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
edit Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Northern Ireland civil rights movement. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will try to do this at the NICRM page Blether (talk) 13:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. JBW (talk) 13:23, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Blether (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
'The block was Not Necessary'. I became involved in contested editing at [1955 United Kingdom general election]. At the last I *left the article itself in the state the other editor enforced by making three reverts*. Instead of engaging in an edit war I made an edit-warring report regarding that editor about the issue. (Previously I requested that editor to use the Talk page to achieve consensus, creating an entry under which to do so). Where is the danger that I will make unconstructive edits? As to multiple accounts, there are more than one person in this family who use this IP address Blether (talk) 14:28, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your explanation of "there are more than one person in this family who use this IP address" does not align with the technical evidence available, and I am declining the unblock request on that basis. firefly ( t · c ) 14:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Blether (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Err... we are using the same computer Blether (talk) 15:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't really believe that, but even so, per WP:MEAT: For the purpose of dispute resolution when there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets.
If you live with someone and they suddenly joined in on an edit war of yours, that is treated as sockpuppetry. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 15:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
edit Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)