BlookerG
Welcome to Wikipedia!
editHello, BlookerG, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. My name is Howicus, and I've been an editor here for some time. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
If you're working on creating a new article, this page has instructions on how to cite sources, complete with videos.
If all this Wikicode is a little overwhelming, WP:Cheatsheet may help untangle it.
If you're looking for a tutorial of sorts, The Wikipedia Adventure is a good option.
And if you need more help, I'd recommend getting live help at the Wikipedia help chat channel (click "connect" to join): #wikipedia-en-help connect. Additionally, you could ask me on my talk page, try the Teahouse (a help page for new users) or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, welcome, and have fun editing! Howicus (Did I mess up?) 01:16, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
edit
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 03:52, Friday, November 22, 2024 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Games coverage of SSX Tricky
editHere's the article you requested. It is split across two columns of text on p.60, so I've merged them for readability. It's quite short, but hopefully it helps. Sorry about the funky angles as this was taken by camera instead of scanner.
- McDonald, Thomas L. "The Electronic Games 100: Sports - SSX Tricky." Games. Issue 176 (Vol 25, #10). Pg.60. December 2001. ISSN 0199-9788.
Let me know if you need anything else. -Thibbs (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks a bunch @Thibbs: BlookerG talk 00:10, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
Your experience with Wikipedia so far
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!
Re:SSX 3
editYes, I think that would knock out most of that paragraph. In addition, the whole section is a bit wordy- for example, you have
"Once all "Race" events are completed on a peak, the player's snowboarder is challenged to a "Backcountry race" by their rival snowboarder, which consists of a one on one race against the rival. Winning the "Backcountry race" unlocks a "Peak race", where the player aims to beat their rival's best time from the top of the peak to the bottom of the mountain. Both "Backcountry races" and "Peak races" have only one heat. Completing the "Peak race" unlocks the next peak."
Which could be rewritten as
"After completing the "Race" events, the player's snowboarder is challenged to a one-on-one "Backcountry race" by their rival. Winning unlocks a "Peak race", where the player aims to beat their rival's best time from the peak to the bottom of the mountain. Both races have only one heat. Completing the races unlocks the next peak."
That's about a 25% reduction without losing anything, and I think you could do the same throughout the section. Also, you don't need to "quote" the names of races. --PresN 00:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Gamergate Sanctions notification
edit
Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.
Disambiguation link notification for February 19
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lego Racers (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split screen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Grow Home (February 19)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grow Home and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! BlookerG,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! One life to live (talk) 11:55, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
|
Re: Lego Racers review
editHere you go. The OPM review appears to be for Lego Racers 2, but I scanned it anyway. Threw in the EGM review for good measure.
Hope these are useful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 00:29, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- @JimmyBlackwing: Thanks a lot for these, they're going to be very helpful for improving the article. I've noticed that the EGM review has 4 individual scores for the game, but Template:Video game reviews lists a typical score from 0.0 to 10.0. Do you know if there some sort of way to average the numbers together, or is there a single overall score I can find somewhere? Thanks again. BlookerG talk 00:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- There's no overall score, and I think averaging might be against the rules. When I've put EGM scores into that template before, I've included them all: 4/4.5/7/2, for example. The template reads that formatting just fine. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- Actually, according to GameRankings, EGM gave it an overall score of 5.5/10. I'll use this score in the review template, but discuss the reviewers' opinions in the section. Thanks for your help! BlookerG talk 13:42, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- There's no overall score, and I think averaging might be against the rules. When I've put EGM scores into that template before, I've included them all: 4/4.5/7/2, for example. The template reads that formatting just fine. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SSX 3 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
The article SSX 3 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:SSX 3 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SSX 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oscar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
The article SSX 3 you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:SSX 3 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Re: Grow Home
editIt's a relatively new idea, and purely optional; in the same discussion that changed the template's guideline to round to the nearest whole percent, the suggestion was floated to put in the review count (see Children of Mana for example, currently at FAC) since an average of 8 reviews is a bit different from an average of 80 reviews. That wasn't added to the guidelines, though it got some general support, I just push it as a personal preference that I think helps the table a bit. Feel free to ignore it! --PresN 02:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- @PresN: I fixed the partial links, but Soetermans changed them back. See this revision. Which is correct? Does it matter what the format is? BlookerG talk 21:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi BlookerG, I think WP:NOPIPE makes it clear. For instance [[Rock, Paper Shotgun]]'s and [[Rock, Paper, Shotgun|Rock, Paper, Shotgun's]] both link to Rock, Paper, Shotgun. You'd be making it easier on yourself, and for other editors too :) Hopes this helps. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 00:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2015
edit
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
3D Tetris
editHere is a link to a Nintendo Power issue that talks a lot about 3D Tetris. I dunno how useful it is, and I'm not super interested in going through it all to see if it can add to the article, so here you go. :D - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 01:04, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- @New Age Retro Hippie: Just about to read this; it's a great find and I commend you greatly for showing it to me. Thanks! BlookerG talk 01:34, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I've added all of the sources I could find to 3D Tetris, so from this point it's pretty much going to be about getting it as cleaned up as humanly possible! - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 00:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for your help. I will definitely assist in cleaning up. BlookerG talk 00:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
- Well, I've added all of the sources I could find to 3D Tetris, so from this point it's pretty much going to be about getting it as cleaned up as humanly possible! - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 00:30, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Snowboard Super Cross
editHi BlookerG,
Could you elaborate on why this is notable? The source you've added says "In fact, SSX stands for snowboard super cross". That's it. The article itself doesn't mention Snowboard Super Cross at all. Snowboarding might be a given, but 'super cross'? SSX (series) says "SSX is intended to be short for "Snowboard Supercross",[1] but the complete title has almost never actually been referred to in any way in the marketing or promotion of the games or within the games themselves. According to 2012's SSX the acronym in Team SSX means: Snowboarding, Surfing, and Motocross." If the title isn't used officially, why should Wikipedia point out what the letters *orginally* stood for? --Soetermans. T / C 15:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
- I guess it isn't notable enough then, sorry. BlookerG talk 15:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lego Racers (video game)
editThe article Lego Racers (video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lego Racers (video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 05:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Lego Racers (video game)
editThe article Lego Racers (video game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lego Racers (video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. AdrianGamer (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
SSX 3
editHi BlookerG, you filed SSX 3 at Featured Article Review, which is actually the process for reviewing existing FAs to determine if they still meet the standards. You nomination has been moved to the correct venue, WP:FAC. Please see Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/SSX 3/archive1. --Laser brain (talk) 14:08, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yeah, sorry about that. I did it in good faith, but messed up. Thanks for understanding! BlookerG talk 18:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
edit
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/SSX 3 at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:51, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Grow Home
edit
A tag has been placed on Draft:Grow Home requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GamerPro64 02:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Lego Racers?
editHello, BlookerG! Congratulations on the promotion of Lego Racers. I was wondering ... before you began editing the article I had the intention of reaching GA as well, and added most of the info to the Development section and the Gameplay section, plus some info to the Reception section. However, I went on hiatus and stopped working on it. I was only wondering if you would mind me adding Lego Racers to my own list of GAs, because I do feel I laid a lot of the basis for the promotion. Best regards, --Khanassassin ☪ 13:00, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking! You're very welcome to if you feel it's right. Lego Racers is such a rad game, I had to pay it tribute somehow. BlookerG talk 17:10, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- I play Lego Racers annually, I don't think there's been a year without me re-installing it, haha! :) --Khanassassin ☪ 09:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2015
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
To Pimp A Butterfly
editThe score was already discussed in the section's first few sentences ("At Metacritic, which assigns... the album received an average score of 96"). Please avoid using the rationale that because other stuff exists in similar fashion, it is acceptable for another article to have it the same way (Doolite (album) became a featured article eight years ago, and as you can see here, the version that was reviewed and promoted did not mention Metacritic at all). The lead should be a summary of an article's "most important aspects". The importance of information and what content gets added to an article is determined by the level of third-party coverage it received; Wikipedia article are "not a dumping ground for any and all information that readers consider important or useful. For the sake of neutrality, Wikipedia cannot rely upon any editor's opinion about what topics are important." (WP:THIRDPARTY#Why third-party sources are required) What source independent of Metacritic (a third-party) establishes the importance of their information? Is there a preponderance of sources that highlights the fact the album received a score of 96 from Metacritic or even that it was the highest-rated rap album on their site? It is off-topic anyway and can only be meant to bludgeon readers with the fact that the album was very well received by critics, which is already established by the critics who are discussed in the section and the sentence "it received widespread acclaim from music critics". The idea that the album received widespread acclaim from critics is something that's been covered by a number of other sources, but its ranking at Metacritic isnt, so it shouldn't be accorded anymore weight than any of the other scores or specific critics in that section. There's no need to emphasis this point of view and give undue weight to Metacritic, which isn't the topic of the article. Furthermore, this list is fluid and only reflects how Metacritic has calculated the receptions of all those albums (as opposed to other sources that may have documented their receptions differently, i.e. a particular point of view) I don't meant to throw so much policy and guidelines at you, but I've had the same said to me when I was learning also. Dan56 (talk) 01:36, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2015
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 3 — 3nd Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2015, the project has:
|
Content
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2015
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 8, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2015
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2015, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2016
edit
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2016
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
edit
Hello, BlookerG. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2016
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:32, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2016
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 9, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2016
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2016, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
editHello BlookerG! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 20:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
- VG Project Main pages
- VG Project Departments
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2017
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2017, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered 14:32, 9 July 2017 (UTC))
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2017
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2017, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:
|
Content
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q4 2019
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2019, the project has:
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q1 2020
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q2 2020
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
03:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered ~~~~~)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2020, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
Previous issue | Index | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
|
(Delivered 13:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC))
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Latest (and most likely final) issue of the WP:VG newsletter
edit The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 14, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2023
Previous issue | Index
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2022, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:40, 8 March 2023 (UTC)