Bluebeariscool

March 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was changed by Bluebeariscool (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980016 on 2014-03-29T19:54:36+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Katieh5584 (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nostalgia Critic, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nostalgia Critic was changed by Bluebeariscool (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959387 on 2014-03-29T20:00:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nostalgia Critic has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nostalgia Critic was changed by Bluebeariscool (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954632 on 2014-04-12T21:46:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:46, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Costa Concordia disaster, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  [[ axg // ✉ ]] 17:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm AxG. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to ITV (TV channel) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!  [[ axg // ✉ ]] 22:11, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:AxG with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ^Myname^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 10:03, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. ^Myname^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 10:06, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. ^Myname^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 10:08, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 10:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bluebeariscool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I WAS JUST HAVING A LAUGH AND I PROMISE NOT TO DO IT OFTEN EVER AGAIN I PROMISE :) Bluebeariscool (talk) 10:26, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This is not a playground, and I see no evidence of your intention to edit here constructively. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:44, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Content deleted and talk page access revoked.  —SMALLJIM  10:58, 4 May 2014 (UTC)