Welcome!

Hello, Bluegreen5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Fayenatic (talk) 12:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Paul Kemsley

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Paul Kemsley. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:41, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Kemsley, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:50, 27 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

--I wanted to update it to be more accurate. There are some errors in what was written before and the information updated is now more accurate and relevant to what Paul Kemsley does. Is there anything in particular you are concerned about? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluegreen5 (talkcontribs) 17:40, 28 September 2010
What are the errors? You inserted terms such as "successful" and "passionate" which are not really suitable in an encyclopedia article, see WP:PEACOCK. Some of the information that you deleted is not particularly flattering to Mr Kemsley e.g. the Lehmans bet, but it is supported by the Observer which is considered a reliable source.
See also WP:COI. If you have inside information, please consider providing it on the talk page (Talk:Paul Kemsley) so that independent editors can make use of it objectively. - Fayenatic (talk) 12:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bluegreen5. You have new messages at Fayenatic london's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.